MyAssignmentServices uses cookies to deliver the best experience possible. Read more

  • Internal Code :
  • Subject Code :
  • University :
  • Subject Name : Nursing

Evaluation Competencies and Functions

1. A systematic analysis and collection of data to respond to any question or a specific matter are encompassed by the evaluation process. The evaluation is usually done with better efficiency, effectiveness, and accurateness of the enduring activity or a completed project or program. The fact behind considering hiring evaluation professionals is that these professionals adopt numerous ranges of prescribed approaches, stakeholders’ meeting activities, and social discipline techniques to generate fit-for-purpose verification (Muir & Dean, 2017). 

The professional designation of evaluators should cover all the groups and roles fall under the evaluation process. Evaluators must possess the role of a judge to justify the value of a process and provides his concluding judgment for the final report. The stakeholder group should be handled by the evaluator performing the role of program facilitator to assists them in discovering the systematic proposals, evidence, and solutions. Professional evaluators are also supposed to play the role of a methodologist to promote an exact experiment scheme that demonstrates strong casual implications. Also, evaluators must act as an educator in the process whose role is to introduce helpful data to potential clients (Harvey, 2003). The role of the evaluator emphasizes not only the direct upshot of a process but as well in the input, execution, and results of the process. The groups that fall outside the evaluator’s specifications may have a lack of evidence and appropriate approaches to execute the process systematically. The evaluators make the work flexible to demeanor evaluation based on a specific framework, social program nature, resource availability, and special client prospects. 

For policymakers and government, evaluation has a wide range of benefits. 

  • The process also gives power to communities to reshape the policies that are harmful to them.
  • Improved indigenous voice for their rights. 
  • To receive better government services
  • Accountable and transparent government policies. 

In personal thoughts, professionalization would somehow damage the evaluation field in the context of indigenous. Good evaluation requires the knowledge of place and time but not only evaluation techniques. Moreover, the cost of professionalizing evaluation would diminish the resources that are required for evaluative circumstances (Cousins, Cullen, Malik, & Maicher, 2009). The formal evaluation cannot be as flexible as an informal one as it provides the information in the given timeframe. 

The experts believe that professional evaluation can enhance the planning of public segment and procedure, help to identify the need and measures of ongoing projects, and to strengthen the base of the programs. To conduct an appropriate evaluation for a task with maintaining ethics of the process with proper evidence and data, the following points need to be considered: 

  • To identify the basics requirements of the task and to facilitate what will work and why.
  • To determine whether the selected sources are appropriate to collect the required shreds of evidence.
  • To analysis the ongoing process and concluding whether the evaluation will generate intended outcomes in the end. 
  • Considering the given time frame, it would be better to conduct a survey-based evaluation (Walker & Ballard, 2003).

After acknowledging the above considerations, the following steps are to be followed:

  • Clarify the purpose of the evaluation
  • Engaging stakeholders in executing the process
  • Assess availability and collect resources required
  • Develop evaluation questions 
  • Shaping appropriate approaches for measurement and implication
  • Format an evaluation plan
  • Collect information
  • Process information and evaluate the results
  • Deduce and circulate results 
  • Apply assessment findings (National service government, n.a.)

These are the ten general steps that are to be implemented for the completion of the task. However, as per the given condition for a specific task to be evaluated in a short time, there would be consequences of unclear and less accuracy in the evaluation (Alindogan, 2019). To overcome the inaccuracy of the evaluation and better outcomes some steps are required to be omitted. For example, deducing and circulating information can be neglected to get the desired results in a stipulated timeframe. 

3. The scenario of the world clearly shows that indigenous people are facing numerous forms of discrimination based on historical factors like colonization, present aspects of politics, social and economic conditions. The higher levels of illiteracy, poverty, and short life expectancy are the results of these consequences among aboriginal people. The aboriginal people are deprived of their human rights and are still expelled from the culture in Australia. Lack of resources to access basics needs for education has resulted in inferior literacy rates for many aboriginal people of the country. The 2001 census of Australia, only 3 % of aboriginals about 15 years of age had never gone to school as compared to 1 % of non-indigenous. The data represents that only 17 % of aboriginals had completed their 12 years of schooling. The Adult Literacy Survey conducted in New Zealand in 1996 revealed that 66.4% of the Maoris people were underneath the minimum level of literacy to meet the difficult demands of daily work and life (Taylor, 2013). The traditional education structure of the country is underneath the national standards of education which has resulted in higher illiterate adults in the region in the context of aboriginals. The Annual report 2009 reports that in the past five years at AIEF partner schools, out of 149 total students enrolled at the schools, 127 have either finished their 12th or still in the schools and rest have left the school before completing the studies.

Literacy for Special Target Groups: Indigenous Peoples

The most critical data gap identified on the basis of information is National Minimum Standards (NMS) is in numeracy, reading, and writing. Data shows that indigenous students are behind of non-indigenous students from three to five years in numeracy, 4.2 years back in writing, and 3.4 years back in reading. The indigenous students have two years a smaller amount of learning growth from 3 to 9 years which shows a considerable improvement gap. The analysis shows that the cities and regions where indigenous students live added about 60 to 75 % of the nationwide gap in 2017.

The below figure shows how far the attainment gap has changed since 2010 - no position is on trail to fill the gap as of 2018 in any year level or subject.

4. The maximum of aboriginals communal all around the world are living in urban areas and the proportion is constantly increasing. 68 % of indigenous people live in New South Wales, Victoria, and Queensland while Northern territory and Western Australia have only 22 % of the aboriginal population. Australia’s aboriginals’ perception is that they live more likely in barren regions and some other remote area. To maintain the physical association with traditional lands, the indigenous people of Australia, four out of ten still lives in traditional country, frequently distant from urban arrangements.

Youth sexual violence and abuse (YSVA): The impacts and occurrence of YSVA need to be reduced in a remote indigenous community and an ethnically diverse uptown zone within a local city of the Australian community. The occurrence of YSVA was a partially recognized issue in some Torres Strait Islanders and aboriginal societies. It is usually reported in towns and cities or even in remote societies (Rayment-McHugh et al., 2014).

Better health yarning: Another area of concern where investigation need is mandatory is to make aware the indigenous people for their health and improving their life expectancy. Poor health nutrition and lack of physical activities in due time have resulted in increasing the count of aboriginals suffering from chronic diseases like obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and others (Harald & Begley, 2005).

To fit with families: To make the human service evaluation to be genuinely meaningful then the process must be designed to fit the requirements of all concerned elements such as investors, services givers, and customers. Another way of giving families to raise their voices for their needs is by evaluating family support.

To draw the indigenous views and to evaluate the problem, the first step required is to explore the range of previous cases of YSVA occurred in these areas. Systematic observations should be made concerning the red zone points of such areas. In concern of finding ways of improving indigenous people's status of urban areas, community control and respecting the philosophy of its people is the first demand to engage aboriginals’ interest in the process (Clark & Cheers, 2005). To conduct an ethical study which is well planned and carried out in an appropriate manner would be the best approach for the evaluation. 

5. A cluster of skills, knowledge, capabilities, and other constraints essential for successful evaluation planning is termed as core competencies. In the evaluation system, every designation has its specific set of competencies. The AES has three core competencies domains-

  1. Theoretical foundations, research methods, and inquiry domain
  2. Interpersonal skills domain
  3. Project management evaluation domain

All these three domains coat the methodological and technical characteristics of investigation inquiry. The interpersonal competency domain is aligned with the engagement, communication, and partnerships forming. These skills narrate with effective collaboration and communication with investigating partners (Alindogan, 2019). The skills of managing, leading, and powering function recognized in the presented evaluation jobs fall under the AES project evaluation management domain. The awareness of culture, context, and stakeholder province have a wide contact across every utility identifies in the research. The competency of understanding the culture, its perspectives, and contextual principles are key areas that are to be focused by the cultural evaluators.

Cultural competencies may include the ability to promote and evaluate the tradition of the region and to engage people specifically aboriginals in the evaluation process. This practice enables the indigenous people to make use of evaluated evidence in decision making. Cultural evaluators must possess the essential skills of promoting and engaging the indigenous people in the process and to make them aware of the current situation of their place (Campbell, Foster & Davis, 2014). The evaluators should make sure that the results of the process are useful in the context of learning and accountability.

The evaluation process is influenced by culture in multiple ways especially in the context of indigenous society. The influences may include facts like how evaluation matters are formalized, how information is collected, examined, and deduced. Cultural competency can be defined as an attitude towards customs and not a separate status of specific knowledge and skill. An evaluator working in cultural competency is equipped to deal with different segments of societies and to involve contextual and cultural aspects required for evaluation (Blagg, 2011). The evaluator needs to make sure that efforts have cultural significance and produce evocative results for the stakeholders. 

 6. The indigenous learning area lifts complex practical and scientific issues. The most severe problem is of interaction and conduct of teaching which is below the national standards of education for this group. The collection of data and discussion processes reviewed how hard is to reach to find a conclusion of this problem. The collection of good information and evidence is the source to achieve the objectives of the program. The Northern territory division has struggled for many years with the barriers of dispersed schools schemes, incomplete data, and poor information about the sources (Wilson, 2014). The studies found it difficult to gather useful information about the variety, intensity, and superiority of policy to educate native language in schools. The language gap is the chief barrier that has to face from years in collecting data from the resources. The issue of miscommunication between indigenous students and non-indigenous evaluators led lead to the inappropriate collection of data and thus, the conclusion driven cannot be as per intended objectives,

In addition to these, the department does not have sufficient information about the core problems students are facing in the schools, e.g. absenteeism and curriculum data. Moreover, the review process also illustrated that despite putting useful efforts to improve the situation, the evaluators are working with unclear and misleading evidence to compute success. The common barriers addressed in the evaluation of involvement plans designed for aboriginals are high rates of abrasion, range of applicability, and casting disbelief on their effectiveness noted by the Australian Medical Association (Ware, 2013). These consequences reflect the difficulty in collecting information and translation findings into policy. The cultural diversity is another form of barrier evaluators have to face while collecting data from the sources. The indigenous people have different cultures and traditions which can be hard for a non-indigenous evaluator to understand in the timeframe of the evaluation process. Thus evaluator failed in collecting information in a cultural competence domain. Thus statistical shortcoming of desired data incorporated multiple barriers in the evaluation (Purdie, Reid, Frigo, Stone, & Kleinhenz, 2011).

References for Advertised Evaluation Roles in Australia

Alindogan, M. A. (2019). Evaluation competencies and functions in advertised evaluation roles in Australia. Evaluation Journal of Australasia19(2), 88-100.

Alindogan, M. A. (2019). Evaluation competencies and functions in advertised evaluation roles in Australia. Evaluation Journal of Australasia19(2), 88-100.

Blagg, H. (2011). Journeys outside the comfort zone: Doing research in the Aboriginal domain. In Qualitative criminology: Stories from the field (pp. 140-152). Federation Press.

Campbell, M., Foster, D., & Davis, V. (2014). Looking back, moving forward: The place of evaluation at the Tangentyere Council Research Hub. Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social contexts14(Special Issue: Evaluation), 144-153.

Clark, K., & Cheers, D. (2005). Designing evaluations that'fit'with families: getting it right and getting results!. Developing Practice: The Child, Youth and Family Work Journal, (14), 30.

Cousins, J. B., Cullen, J., Malik, S., & Maicher, B. (2009). Debating professional designations for evaluators. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation6(11), 71-82.

Harald, P., & Begley, L. (2005). 'Yarning for better health': improving the health of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. Australian family physician34(1-2), 27.

Harvey, G. (2003). Guesthood as ethical decolonising research method. Numen50(2), 125-146.

Muir, S., & Dean, A. (2017). Evaluating the outcomes of programs for Indigenous families and communities. Family Matters, (99), 56.

National service government. (n.a.). Basic steps of evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.nationalservice.gov/sites/default/files/resource/Basic%20Steps%20Description%20of%20Audio.pdf

Purdie, N., Reid, K., Frigo, T., Stone, A., & Kleinhenz, E. (2011). Literacy and numeracy learning: lessons from the Longitudinal Literacy and Numeracy Study for Indigenous Students.

Rayment-McHugh, S., Smallbone, S., Wardell, M., Smith, D., Wortley, R., & Homel, R. (2014). on being realistic about reducing the prevalence and impacts of youth sexual violence and abuse in two australian indigenous communities. Mystery Train 2007.

Taylor, J. (2013). Data for better Indigenous policy evaluation: Achievements, constraints and opportunities'. Better Indigenous policies: The role of evaluation, 119-30.

Walker, R., & Ballard, J. (2003). Developing paradigms and discourses to establish more appropriate evaluation frameworks and indicators for housing programs. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Western Australia Research Centre.

Ware, V. (2013). Improving the accessibility of health services in urban and regional settings for Indigenous people (Vol. 27). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

Wilson, B. (2014). A share in the future: Review of Indigenous education in the Northern Territory. Education Business.

Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Nursing Assignment Help

Get It Done! Today

Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
Not Specific >5000
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts

Highlights

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total

    Free
  • Let's Start

Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore MASS
Order Now

Request Callback

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assignment help

Get 500 Words FREE
Ask your Question
Need Assistance on your
existing assignment order?