• Internal Code :
  • Subject Code :
  • University :
  • Subject Name : General Management

Capability-Based Conceptualization

McManus, S., Seville, E., Vargo, J., & Brunsdon, D. (2008). Facilitated process for improving organizational resilience. Natural Hazards Review9(2), 81-90.

Resilient organizations contribute greatly to societies that are resilient. That being said, a failure to transform the idea of resilience into concrete working structures for organizations complicates the challenge of developing more robust organizations. Furthermore, resilience is often called concern in disaster or emergency response. Organizations usually do not realize the connexion between building resilience in day-to-day activities and providing a resilient emergency recovery & response. Resilience is considered to have 3 main characteristics for organizations. The consciousness of the situation, keystone vulnerability management, and adaptive capability. A facilitated mechanism that helps companies improve their output in comparison to these qualities is implemented. This approach is called resilience management which was created and validated in New Zealand with 10 case study entities deliberately chosen to represent a diverse variety of markets, company styles, and sizes. A few of the initial problems of resilience that will emerge from this research are also discussed briefly. The research focuses on classifying the core principles of organizations that render it quite resilient in the context of New Zealand in the midst of emergency circumstances and using these insights to establish techniques to strengthen organizational resilience. The challenge of becoming more robust organizations is compounded by the lack of organization to transform the idea of resilience into concrete functioning frameworks. Organization resilience is characterized as a role of an organization's overall understanding of the circumstances, managing of keystone weaknesses, and adaptive ability in a complicated, competitive, and interconnected world. The method of resilience management is developed to help organizations to measure and maximize their total resilience. Initial outcomes of Ten case study organizations' in New Zealand that use the method of resilience management suggest that few of the main measures of resilience include knowledge of the duties and obligations of stakeholders, dangerous incidents, and their effects, along with recovery objectives. For particular organizations, resilience management is used primarily at functional levels instead of at the management level in an enterprise. However, the scalability of resilience management is a major benefit, and the system components can theoretically be implemented at a number of operational levels. The paper is relevant as it states the mechanism of strengthening the organization's resilience. The strength of the paper is that numerous suggestions have been given for the potential implementation of resilience management approaches for organizations and the limitation of the paper is that it lacks the analysis to test the adequacy of the resilience management method for groups of organizations that have a similar goal or work inside different industries. The paper states the facilitated mechanism for strengthening resilience in the organization which is related to the topic.

Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011). Organizational resilience: development of a conceptual framework for organizational responses. International Journal of Production Research49(18), 5581-5599.

The notion of resilience has gained growing acceptance within the intellectual world in recent years. Understanding the mechanisms of effective adaptation within companies offers a significant avenue for future study, considering the potentially devastating effects of disturbances. This analytical paper concentrates on exploring the identification and triggering of characteristics within an organization's reaction to destructive events. A philosophical structure of a resilient organizational reaction is presented. Therefore, this paper concentrates on developing a clear philosophical foundation for organizational resilience on which it is possible to build future empirical research. The context research on resilience is outlined in this article and provides a working concept of organizational resilience. The framework encourages critical thought in order to define an organization's approach to disturbances and seeks to encourage organizational growth by detailing the essential processes required for a resilient response to be produced by an organization. Lastly, findings are addressed and the consequences of resilience for small and medium-sized organizations are highlighted and a future study roadmap is illustrated. The research focuses on discussing the identification and triggering of features in an organization's reply to disrupting incidents. There are detrimental consequences of the predicament that can arise at any time by abrupt shifts in societal, economic, and environmental periods that trigger disturbances and are required to overcome such predicament. The identification and triggering process is perceived as a vital stage in the ability of an organization to favorably adapt to a disturbance. The ability of an organization to take a constructive attitude to danger reduction, though, is partly controlled by the ability of the organization to detect possible divergences. Organizations that can handle all external and internal framework inputs smartly & are thus able to mobilize their surplus energy and capital efficiently may be more efficient and ready to respond to environmental uncertainty and dislocations efficiently. A company will have more ability to effectively managing threats and building the tools required to resolve potential instability by cultivating the characteristics of resilience. As such, companies would be well equipped to resolve increased-impact, limited-probability incidents, and ecological displacements that aim to strengthen their resilience. In order to create a philosophical structure to discuss the characteristics of a robust organizational response to significant disturbances, this article applies a theory-building approach. Organizational resilience may provide a way of creating organizational structures that, under volatile climate factors, can address this complexity by responding to immediate danger and planning for future instability. The paper is relevant as it seeks to offer a deeper understanding of organizational behavior in uncertain situations and aims to examine the relations among organizational resilience and other principles in business planning, such as competitive edge and risk assessment. The strength of the paper is that it explores the approach of improving organizational resilience, and in relation to organizational reactions organizational resilience is addressed and the resulting structural meanings. The drawback of the paper is that there is no discussion of relations between the capacities of an entity and the philosophical structure proposed. The paper states about the method of developing organizational resilience which is related to the topic.

Seville, E., Brunsdon, D., Dantas, A., Le Masurier, J., Wilkinson, S., & Vargo, J. (2008). Organizational resilience: Researching the reality of New Zealand organizations. Journal of business continuity & emergency planning2(3), 258-266.

This paper summarises the outcomes of a 6-year research effort currently ongoing in New Zealand to establish methods to enhance corporate responsiveness to major disaster events. The analysis takes an organizational structure perspective, understanding that numerous interconnections occur between and within various entities that impair their capacity to adapt and recover. This suggests that for every one organization, successful resilience management should look past the one organization to recognize the resilience of other organizations on which it relies. Relevant facets of the research group's organizational resilience contain: how specific organizations are prepared to react and rebound from disaster events; their capacity to interact and exchange knowledge in order to efficiently guide assets throughout crises, and the contractual and legal structure under which they may have to function throughout crisis management and mitigation. A single organization operating alone cannot fix its troubles. Organizations are expected to strive for greater resilience. The study seeks to examine how and why organizations manage danger activities and investigate how the investment is given priority, both within and from a larger viewpoint within organizations. It aims to establish operational planning techniques that connect crisis resilience with daily operations. Forms for creating an inter-organizational hazard planning mechanism both within and beyond the borders of the business sector. Prioritization and allocation of human and physical capital during a threat occurrence for reaction and recovery. In the wake of a significant catastrophe, the legal and statutory environment under which companies will be expected to work. The capacity of an organization to withstand a significant crisis relies on its internal structure, the operating and management processes they have in place, and their stability. Organizations struggle all the time with uncertainties and unpredictable incidents, and handling them provides the company with both benefits and threats. Crisis situations, however, vary beyond a certain scale from daily management, in that entities have to act out of their normal routine, collaborate with companies they do not usually deal with, and have to efficiently and easily create and discuss strategic decisions. Being able to adapt quickly to disaster situations is a true measure of what makes a clicking enterprise. Resilience is an organizational function: understanding of the environment, control of keystone weaknesses, and adaptive capability. In the face of difficulties, a resilient organization is the one which nevertheless capable of achieving its core targets. That being said, resilience is not something that any particular organization operating in isolation can do. The Resilient Organisations study Initiative has been collaborating with companies in New Zealand to establish methods to enhance corporate resilience and to demonstrate the requirement to act together across conventional borders to handle resilience. The analysis clearly indicates, through an implementation concept, that there are substantial changes for corporate involvement in the need to become much more responsive to disaster events. Nevertheless, the continuing task remains to obtain the sustained attention needed to effectively handle problems of sustainability that have shared rather than personal ownership. The paper is relevant as it outlines the implementation of methods to strengthen organizations' resilience to significant disaster events. The strength of the paper is that it describes the outcomes of a 6-year study effort currently ongoing in New Zealand to establish methods to enhance corporate resilience to major disaster events. The limitation of the paper is that it is confined exclusively to New Zealand's organization. The paper states about the organizational resilience which is related to the topic

Pal, R., Torstensson, H., & Mattila, H. (2011). Organizational resilience and health of business systems. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management2(4), 372-398.

For success and sustainability, resilience in companies is crucial and a shortage of it may lead to costly operational failures or insolvencies in today's volatile and unpredictable climate. The paper describes an inquiry, in terms of economic feasibility, to link organizational resilience to its market 'health' during 1989 and 2009. The consequences are numerous, viz. Company 'health' and ORes conceptual frameworks and, subsequently, the current relationship implementation by analytical findings. Financial statements (1989 to 2009) of twenty companies in Sweden linked to textiles, clothes, and fashion (TCF) are reviewed to draw the appropriate conclusions. The analysis uses the Altman Z-score as a corporate 'health' metric that involves different percentages linked to a company's short-term and long-term targets. In addition, the transformation feature of the Z-score allows the organization to assess its 'health' and ORes market, in the middle of uncertainty, and therefore evaluate the underlying attributes. It can be a valuable method for organizations to compare themselves with their rivals. Further analysis figures out what separates the good organization from the failed ones. The purpose of this paper is to detail a study on the resilience of companies, viewed as accessible and diverse business processes, to their 'health' business over a considerable span of time, portrayed in terms of their financial viability. Significant fluctuations in unpredictable developments and threats in the corporate world have driven companies to seek the opportunity to respond more persistently to these potential untoward incidents. An additional form to glance at ORes is from the evolutionary point of view, as resilience may not necessarily be a sheer means to arise greater from inevitable difficulties and hardships. Instead, owing to psychological well-being toward persistent traumatic experiences or turmoil, it may be a pattern or trait established in the enterprise over a time span. All main schools of thinking hold the sentiment that ORes involves elements of the system's preparation, resilience, or recovery over time and thus involves system reconstruction. The nature of ORes lies in organizations' timely preparation, reactivity, or regeneration from disaster incidents or anticipated incidents. In view of its reaction to these disaster situations, which mainly impacts a company is financial results. Financial data was compiled over a 21-year period from the balance sheets and income statements of 20 TCF companies in Sweden. At first, an email list of 290 TCF-related companies in Sweden was made and submitted as part of the first working process between Dec 2009 and Feb 2010, dependent on communications collected and browsing via the archive of Europages. Based on the above selection criteria it was dependent on a convenience-based non-probabilistic sampling methodology for the selection of firms: both firms were 'aktiebolag' (AB) (limited company), were popular in both categories, and included a suitable mail sample communication information. Usable answers were collected from 42 businesses, analyzed for rigorous review. If the company is able to deal well with emergency situations, it will achieve increased financial stability. This clearly reasons for the company system's improved 'health'. The paper is relevant to the topic as it states the resilience of the organizational and well-being of business processes. The strength of the report is that it has accounting data obtained over a period of 21 years from the balance sheets and income statements of 20 TCF businesses in Sweden. The limitation of the paper is that it doesn't have proper conceptualization and eventual operationalization and mainly small and medium-sized businesses were selected, many of them were either fabric and garment producers or manufacturing textiles, only a few companies or outlets were portrayed, none of the leading Swedish clothing stores were portrayed in particular. The research was confined only to private AB companies that were not listed on the capital exchange. The paper is helpful to the topic as it states about the connection between the market system and the resilience of the organization.

Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business Research13(1), 215-246.

Organizations are required to create a resilience capability in increasingly unpredictable and challenging times that helps them to deal efficiently with unforeseen incidents, return back from disasters, and even encourage potential growth. While in recent times, scholarly interest in organizational resilience has gradually increased, there is less agreement over what resilience truly entails and how it is built. More information about organizational capacities that comprise resilience, as well as requirements for their growth, is especially required. Through expanding the understanding of the dynamic and interconnected nature of organizational resilience, this paper aims to make a contribution to this heterogeneous research area. It conceptualizes durability as a meta-capability and disintegrates the framework into its individual components. The paper proposes 3 successive levels of resilience (expectation, dealing, and ability to adapt) influenced by process-based research and provides an outline of fundamental capacities that together shape organizational resilience. On the basis of this description, the interactions and relationships of the various levels of resilience and also the key contexts and operators are explored. It develops proposals that can serve as a framework for future scientific work. The goal of this paper is to contribute to this diverse area of study by expanding the understanding of the dynamic and interconnected structure of organizational resilience. Organizations shall be able to navigate all of the aspects of the unforeseen in order to thrive in unpredictable conditions and to facilitate potential progress. Companies need to build a capacity for flexibility that helps them to adapt appropriately to unpredictable events and focus on events that could theoretically endanger the survival of a company. The conceptual model of the dynamic structure is still in its beginning, while the research study in organizational resilience has gradually risen in recent times. There is no agreement as to what durability entails and what components it comprises. Based on process-based resilience studies, it describes 3 consecutive phases of resilience (expectation, handling, and ability to adapt) and attributes to these phases significant organizational capabilities. Much of the literature on resiliency is normative and standard. In specific, research concentrate on traits, capabilities, or attitudes that appear to differentiate between resilient and less resilient organizations. There are, moreover, 2 major methods that can improve the knowledge: (1) process approaches identify various phases of resilience and understand the complex essence of resilience, and (2) resilience capacity studies offer insight into resilience's inner operations. These 2 methods will, in conjunction, encourage a thorough view of the phenomena of resilience and establish a deep base for academic studies on the emergence of resilient organizations. Resilience is a basic organizational power geared towards the development of organizations. It helps businesses to endure pressures, continually evolve, and respond easily to transitions. Resilience will, thus, be a significant source of sustained competitive benefit and should be purposely created. Although, more information on how organizational resilience functions and how it can be built is needed. The paper is relevant as it states about the conceptualization of organizational resilience. The strength of the paper is that recent literature on organizational resilience has been thoroughly reviewed and provides a wider understanding of organizational resilience. The limitation of the paper is that there is a lack of research into how organizations effectively plan for unforeseen incidents, accept issues, and benefit from issues, and the factors of the resilience process. Future research may explain the crucial role of organizational experience, layout, and culture in improving the capacity of an organization to cope with unforeseen and threatening circumstances. Differentiating between different levels of study, e.g. factors on the levels of person, community, and organization, also seems beneficial. The paper is useful to the topic as it states in detail about the conceptualization of organizational resilience.

References for Building Organisational Resilience

Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011). Organizational resilience: development of a conceptual framework for organizational responses. International Journal of Production Research49(18), 5581-5599.

Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business Research13(1), 215-246.

McManus, S., Seville, E., Vargo, J., & Brunsdon, D. (2008). Facilitated process for improving organizational resilience. Natural Hazards Review9(2), 81-90.

Pal, R., Torstensson, H., & Mattila, H. (2011). Organizational resilience and health of business systems. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management2(4), 372-398.

Seville, E., Brunsdon, D., Dantas, A., Le Masurier, J., Wilkinson, S., & Vargo, J. (2008). Organizational resilience: Researching the reality of New Zealand organizations. Journal of business continuity & emergency planning2(3), 258-266.

Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Management Assignment Help

Get It Done! Today

Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
Not Specific >5000
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts

Highlights

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total

    Free
  • Let's Start

Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore MASS
Order Now

Request Callback

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assignment help

Hire Certified Experts
Ask your Question
Need Assistance on your
existing assignment order?

We care

MyAssignmentServices uses cookies to deliver the best experience possible.
My Assignment Services acknowledges the academic integrity guidelines prescribed as per Australian Universities to ensure that the services, sample material, and study resources available on our website, in no way are utilised to commit academic misconduct of any type. All users of our services must adhere to and affirm acceptance of all conditions elucidated in our policy document on academic integrity.

Please accept and affirm the following to be able to continue exploring our website and services: I agree to NOT use any educational material, study resources, assignment samples, online mentoring services, available on the web domain www.myassignmentservices.com and all its subdomains to commit any academic misconduct. I have read and been made fully aware of the academic integrity policy of My Assignment Services and by clicking on the button below, I am in principle, wilfully and legally bound to adhere to guidelines of the academic integrity policy in whole and in part.
View Cookies policy | How we ensure Academic Integrity?