Critical Analysis of Low Enrolment and Graduation Rates Among Indigenous (or Specific) CommunitiesAssignment Sample

• Subject Code : UNCC300
• Subject Name : Arts and Humanities

Justice And Change In A Global World 

Introduction

It is said that education is a powerful tool that aids in achieving better economic outcomes. The education system has evolved around many divisions and now it is focusing on introducing leadership roles. The strategies and learnings help the individual in getting knowledge on health, education, and economic outcomes for all. The same is the case with the Indigenous population, education is the crucial factor that is reducing Indigenous disadvantage. Although, many efforts have been made by the universities of Australia, the participation of these people is less in education.

According to Pechenkina & Kowal, 2018 the analysis of data shows that the students in higher education are divided into two categories that I high enrollment and low competition and low enrollments and high competition. He also said that the universities that have fewer enrolled students are getting more success as compared to others with a large number of students. While, IHEAC, 2016 stated that characteristics of institutions are responsible for the patterns of outcomes achieved by them. The statement arrived from the report that the students are classified based on socio-economic status. Hence, this is the reason that Indigenous Australians are small in number as per enrollment in institutions is concerned for higher education. According to my view, financial framework and current policy have to be aligned to reduce the attrition rates and develop a sense of encouragement in them.

Higher education is said that it contributes to a large scale in developing capabilities and knowledge appropriately. The strategies used in it have an important role in contributing to the development of the Indigenous population. This could be achieved by making a critical shift in higher education policy for Indigenous people. It means that a new paradigm needs to be built for getting success but it would involve a large number of strategies to develop productivity, partnerships, and pathways for Indigenous people (Hunter & Schwab 2016).

The new paradigm will require the realignment of strategies within the institutions to combine with the main business and accountability of setting. The scenario can not be changed until and unless leadership quality emerges in Indigenous people. The combination of strategies will include the planning cycles and processes to move ahead of discrimination. This will help them in achieving adequate structures and decision-making with real change (Bradley, Noonan, et al. 2018).

Skene & Evamy in 2019 stated that the government has done very good in reforming the policies and including Indigenous and disadvantaged groups to avail education. 14% to 20% increase is the target of the government to achieve by 2020 and make the developments in socioeconomic backgrounds. However, while in CHSE, 2018 it has appeared that socioeconomic status is the main issue for participation in higher education amongst Indigenous Australians. It was noted that no doubt if the students from remote and regional areas of Australia get enrolled in higher institutes they perform equally well similar to non-Indigenous people.

The statistical data on higher education performance by the Indigenous population was shared and revealed that admission is not the only task in the education system, but also support is needed to grab the opportunities in an effective manner (Tinto, 2018). To ensure the quality in higher education among Indigenous people, the students should be given the support that greatly affects the chances of students getting higher success. While the patterns discussed in DEEWR, 2015 states that some universities do not face any challenge while educating Indigenous students while some said that it gets very challenging for them to address the challenge of funding and following the policy. It means that the system should be such that, it should encourage the institutions to improve the enrollment system and participation of students.

Conclusion

From the above critical analysis, it can be concluded that the efforts should be made from both the sides that is government as well as institutions to encourage students and enhance enrollment system. The statistical data have presented a clear picture of what is the status in institutions in terms of learning.

References

Bradley, D., P. Noonan, 2018. Review of Australian Higher Education: Final Report. Canberra, ACT, Commonwealth of Australia: 10.

DEEWR., 2015. "Indigenous Support Program Guidelines." Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Retrieved 10 July 2011, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/indigenous/highereducation/programs/pages/indigenoussupport.asp x.

IHEAC, 2016. Improving Indigenous Outcomes and Enhancing Indigenous Culture and Knowledge in Australian Higher Education. Report to the Minister for Education, Science, and Training.

Pechenkina, E., E. Kowal, 2018. "Indigenous Australian students' participation rates in higher education: Exploring the role of universities." Australian Journal of Indigenous Education In Press.

Skene, J. & S. Evamy, 2019. Does access equal success? The critical role of the First-Year Experience (FYE) in achieving equity in higher education. First Year in Higher Education. Townsville, Queensland.

Tinto, V., 2018. "Access without support is not opportunity " 36th Annual Institute for Chief Academic Officers, The Council of Independent Colleges, from http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2008/06/09/tinto.

Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Humanities Assignment Help