• Internal Code :
  • Subject Code :
  • University : Western Sydney University
  • Subject Name : Building and Construction

Determination of a Development Plan

For an area to be developed, there is a need to comply with all development requirements as provided by the city council or the county where the development ought to be done. In this case, I will assess the viability of developing a detached dual occupancy in 18 Valley Road, Eastwood, in Parramatta. Before any development is undertaken in any given area, it vital that all environmental aspects that determine quality development plans are adhered to before commencing with the actual development procedure.

Site Details

18 Valley Road, Eastwood in Parramatta, is surrounded by several dual detached buildings in which many have already been accomplished while others are still under construction. Recently, the area has seen an increase in double storey buildings. Therefore, the proposed development plan has to be compatible with the already established structures. Furthermore, many of the structures, such as the single storey brick with fibro garage and structures of such kinds, will be demolished. The area only has one storey brick with a fibro garage. The proposed site is 16.7m frontage and 40.3 side boundary. It can be concluded that the site permits dual occupancy construction since the site is zoned R2 residential. In terms of topography, the site is generally gentle in sloping with a consistent fall from the northern boundary down to the southern boundary. The north boundary is the frontage, while the southern boundary is the rear side.

Site Zoning

The site is R2 residential zoned. This implies that the proposed area complies with the requirements set aside by Parramatta DCP 2011 and LEP 2011, which regulate how residential areas should be developed. R-2 zones are viable for the development of semi-detached residential dwellings, and such areas are protected from denser types of residential development. As such, R-2 zoned areas are predominantly developed with semi-detached houses and mostly lie on moderately sized slots which also constitutes of detached dwellings. If the construction is to be conducted, then buildings are supposed not to bypass the 90ft height, and the structure will as well be removed from the lot lines of its lot with a distance of not less than 1ft. For any excess foot in height, appropriate authority ought to be contacted first for validation. Therefore, based on zoning, the proposal is viable to be conducted.

Compliance to the Principle Development Standards

The construction proposal in question will entail the demolition of the existing buildings, which are the dwelling place for quite a lot of people. It will also involve the construction of two storey detached dual occupancy with the associated landscaping, the site works, and the subdivision of Torrens title. For quality structures, compliance with development standards is inevitable. In this case, all the economic sustainability standards, environmental sustainability standards, and the social sustainability aspects should be met before commencing with the construction works (Akadiri et al., 2012). Economic sustainability entails the ultimate satisfaction gained by clients, suppliers, and employers. This will result from improved productivity, which will be associated with the project. Based on the proposal, many stakeholders will be involved in the entire construction process. The demolition that will be conducted will be for the good of the residents since the quality structure will be erected after that. This justifies the economic sustainability that is associated with the proposal.

The project also meets the environmental sustainability standards since it does not destroy the green environment, but rather its conducted in areas that were already developed. The proposal states that landscaping will also be done. This implies that the gently sloping topography will be considered in the construction process. This ensures that all construction procedures conform to the requirements in case of adverse environmental effects. The proposal meets the social sustainability standards since the slot where it is meant to be undertaken will undergo subdivision. This is because the Torrens land title will be subdivided to cater for the new construction project.

The Proposal and The S4.14 of The EPA Act

Section 4.14 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act of 1979 stipulates that no construction should be conducted in bushfire-prone land (Wales, 1979). As such, the consent for development should not be granted if the land in question is prone to bushfire. It cannot be lawfully utilized for the construction of residential structures. Exceptions are provided for the section if the project in question is a significant state development project or the project fully conforms to the prevailing regulations. The proposal in question is not in any way against the provisions stipulated in the EPA Section 4.14. For instance, the area where the project ought to be undertaken is already inhabited. This implies that the area is already residential. The only issue with the current residential structures is that they are single brick storey structures. As such, they cannot be entirely referred to be quality residential structures. Therefore, the proposal complies with Section 4.14 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act of 1979.

Proposal Determination

For any project to be accepted as viable to be conducted, it is vital that all the requirements ought to be accomplished. This range widely from the environmental aspects to societal social facets. Based on the proposal facets presented, the proposal should be implemented in the shortest time possible. To justify my determination, the proposal development plan stipulates all the activities that accompany it. They include Title subdivision, demolition of single storey structures, and the development of the associated landscapes. No single section of the law has been violated by the provisions in the proposal. Also, the proposal complies with the principle development standards.

Proposed Minimum Subdivision Lot Size

Total size = 40.3 by 16.7 (m)

= 40.32 + 16.72 =1902.98

= √1902.98 = 43.62 m2

Proposed height of the building is 91.9 ft (Shown on the diagram). However, the required height for buildings in R-2 zones is 90ft. Therefore, the extra 1.9ft will be built after obtaining consent from the council.

Proposed Floor Space Ratio

FSR = Building area: Lot size

= 638: 1903

= 1:3

Proposed Deep Soil Zone

The area is R-2 zoned meaning it permits construction of dual habitats. However, this only goes for 85ft as indicted on the diagram.

Proposed Landscape Area

1903 – 638 = 1265 m2

Proposed Solar Access

The structure will shadow neighbors at 16 Valley Road. Therefore, two bedrooms, en-suite and laundry will not be habitable

Conclusion

The main aspects of sustainability should be accomplished before any proposal is accorded to the go-ahead to be implemented. The proposal in question has adhered to all the standards scales of preferences for quality structures. As such, I dully vouch for the proposal to be accorded to the go-ahead for implementation. Besides, few to no adverse effects, either social, environmental, or economic, will be attributed to the project if it is implemented.

References

Akadiri, P. O., Chinyio, E. A., & Olomolaiye, P. O. (2012). Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector. Buildings, 2(2), 126-152.

Wales, N. S. (1979). Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Sydney: Parliamentary Council's Office.

Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Building and Construction Assignment Help

Get It Done! Today

Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
Not Specific >5000
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts

"

5 Stars to their Experts for my Assignment Assistance.

There experts have good understanding and knowledge of university guidelines. So, its better if you take their Assistance rather than doing the assignments on your own.

What you will benefit from their service -

I saved my Time (which I utilized for my exam studies) & Money, and my grades were HD (better than my last assignments done by me)

What you will lose using this service -

Absolutely nothing.

Unfortunately, i had only 36 hours to complete my assignment when I realized that it's better to focus on exams and pass this to some experts, and then I came across this website.

Kudos Guys!

Jacob

"

Highlights

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total

    Free
  • Let's Start

Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore MASS
Order Now

Request Callback

Tap to ChatGet instant assignment help

Get 500 Words FREE
Ask your Question
Need Assistance on your
existing assignment order?