Table of Contents
Emerging Ethical AI framework.
An explanation of the content, context and stakeholders associated with the Ethical AI Framework.
A discussion of the Framework’s ethical stance.
A discussion of the Framework’s governance.
Conclusion summarizing strengths and limitations.
In the present day is has been observed that there is almost data for every aspect of life, due to which there has been an increase in machine learning. This has been a significant development for society; with the advanced machine learning system, there has been much ease to human lives. Society now has greater control in the community. The advanced machine learning system has reduced the efforts of humans by opting and studying nature. A debate has been raised that are human and artificial intelligence are compatible or not, balancing the tension between has been remained focused. Humans need to use artificial intelligence properly. Using the AI in the wrong means would not be good for the option for human society. Ethics and governance have a prime role in developing and generating ArtificialIntelligence. Artificial Intelligence can be beneficial for human society by sharing the burden of humans. Various sectors of the community have been positively affected by advanced technology. Quality of life has been increasing with their daily use. New dimensions are being developed in various sectors. Much of the effort has been reduced by these Artificial Intelligence devices (Potential for participatory big data ethics and algorithm design: a scoping mapping review., 2018).
Artificial Intelligence aims to focus on many sectors of society, for example, economics, psychological, financial, legal, and environmental. Reducing the labor work in the business by artificial intelligence will increase the potential and efficiency of the business. This is one of the social impacts of AI. Developing robots the same as humans are being considered. Although these impacts and concerns are making serious concerns to some people, they are concerned about the risks which have been generated, for example, privacy, human rights, dignity, power in few hands, and many other problems. Some of these concerns are needed to be addressed properly. There are several ways by which AI could be used in many negatives ways; they can be used in criminal activity, which has developed a legal concern for society; the government needs to consider all of these concerns. With the use of artificial intelligence, the use of energy consumption will be increased, which has an impact on the environment (E.Schultz, 2018).
Artificial Intelligence focuses on providing facilitates in almost every sector for life. This can be a major transformation for human society, health, education, transport, private and public; artificial intelligence can support almost every part. Recently robotics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and sensors have been the contribution to human society a lot; AI aims to reduce the human effort and provide safety to humans. Despite learning human habits by machines seem strange and unusual, but with the transformation of advanced machine learning, there will be a lot to see in the future. Artificial intelligence has shown significant importance. It has been advancing on the daily basics. Revolution by AI would be seen in the future, although AI is being used in many parts of the community. This community has started to accept the latest technology in their common life. There is a great advantage of using the AI system. It can perform its activities, which is contributing and helping humans in their daily lives. It is becoming smarter and more intelligent day by day. The most common examples are Siri in apple devices, google assistants in android devices (Benois-Pineau, 2017).
The measure of the transparency is such a factor which is the most integral for the attainment of trust of the stakeholders. These are the measures which are implied in the course of preparing the different implications of conceptual framework and stance of advancement. The assessment is maintained in the course of developing the bases which are carried out in the analysis of the organizational explications (Wright & Schultz, 2018). These are the bases of understandings which are carried out in the course of consideration in the stakeholder position in the given scenario and the build which is measured in the course of maintaining the alignment in the operational executions of corporations.
The measures of the synthesis in the distinctions of the priorities are evaluated in the consideration of the given system of Ethical AI measures analysis. These are the bases which are pertaining the implications of analysis in the course of expanding the premises in the understanding of the integral components of the shareholders (Schnackenberg & Tomlinson, 2016). These are the bases of evaluations which are measured in the domains of operations and bases at which are evaluations maintained in the stance of delivering the conceptual course of analysis and structuring of the appropriate policy for the system and stakeholders.
The different domains which are expanded in the course of aligning the factors maintained in the consideration of aligned transparent bases are the values which are instilled and observed in the system as per the dynamics of maintained stakeholder alignment and executions in the firm (Winfield & Jirotka, 2018). The bases of accompanying consideration propensities and measures of expansions in the distinctions of aligning the organization and bases of stakeholder interactions are valued bases which are the distinctions at which the operations are incited at a valued organization.
There are different considerations which are carried out in the course of providing the understanding implications in the course of analyzing the bases of ethical framework and bases of considered propensities in the dimensions of operations (Taddeo & Floridi, 2018). These are provided in the system of operations which are to be discussed and elaborated in the course of aligning the bases of strategic and financial bases of alliances. These are the notions which are maintained in the considerations which are measured in the course of providing the propensities of firm bases at which the organization can be governed at the appropriate bases of operations. These are the considerations which are aligned with the distinctions carried out in the developments as the induction of the AI in the market. These bases of the alignment factors are to be added to the practices of executions at the organization.
The stance of considering the change at such level of measurement will provide the alignement in the course of organizational bases of consideration and evaluation of the different bases which are maintained in the designation of framework and evaluation of the trust build and openness towards the partners. The measure of the framework in the reliance of AI is assessed to be necessarily incorporated in the course of maintaining the development of adaptation once the technology has matured (Coeckelbergh, et al., 2016). The consideration of use of AI is a factor which is to be undertaken when the implications of constant usability are maintained in the course of providing the appropriate bases of compliance. The steering of the powerful considerations are to be maintained in the measure of aligning the different bases of considerations which are to be maintained in the course of providing the appropriate bases of impact for the environment and society.
There is observation of core functions aligned with the bases of propensities which are maintained in the course of established propensities aligned with the course of promotion in the stance of flourishing associated with the opportunities and measures of human risk. The stance which is maintained in the course of providing the different bases of considerations is carried out in the course of measuring the advantages for the organization as they are progressing with the bases of age and stance of time (Stahl & Coeckelbergh, 2016). The evaluation which is maintained in the course of measuring the different elaborations in the measure of approach maintained as per the distinctions of operations is assessed to be build as the progress is carried out in the different distinctions of organization.
The measure of imapact which is observed by the evaluation of the different bases of society are measured in the course of providing the stance of understanding carried out in the measure of developing the course of understanding maintained in the course of executing the functions as per the distinctions of governance in society. These are the bases on which the framework of the ethical AI analysis is based (Tang, et al., 2018). The depiction of the understanding is maintained with the domains in the measuring of stances associated with the alignment and development of the propensities per trained in the stance of dispensing advancement at the course of ease. These bases of ease and considerations are necessary in the understanding establishment and development maintained as per the distinctions of build and development of the system.
The alignment of the propensities maintained in the course of considerations and developments of AI are to be weighed in the ethical consideration before the initiative is made available to the public in the stance of usability. There are different distinctions which are maintained in the course of developing the propensities associated with the social upliftment and wellbeing of different propensities (Wright & Schultz, 2018). These alignments in the basic domains and considerations are maintained with the weighing of the opportunities and considerations which are according to the executions of the different propensities of operations at the organization. The implication is maintained in the distinctions of substantive distinctions of changes and measure of operational implications.
The alignment of the different operations is measured and instilment of the AI is made where necessary in the different phases of the corporate governance. These stances of betterment in the course of assessing the consideration in the distinctions of operations are measured as per the alignment of the advancements with the concept of safety and implications of positive consideration. The domains of the positive measures and the installation of the adaptative means are to be incorporated in the considered bases of positive advantage instilment to the measure of considred propensities (Tang, et al., 2018).The advancements which are maintained in the notion of development are aligned with the propensities which are measured in the weight age of aligning the proportions of considerations an developments which are timescaled with the rest of the aspects of development and maintenance of the system of consideration.
The experiencing of the technological emergence is assessed in the bases of evaluations which are carried out in the considerations which are maintained in the course of aligning the considerations which are developed in the course of technological ease and practical implications of tasks. These are the considerations which are maintained in the understanding established in the domains of carrying out the bases of construction and development of processes which are determined in the stance of maintaining the establishement of appropriate consideration and couse of development. The operations which are aliged with the bases of maintaining the course of considerations in the alignements which are safe and well protected for the producers and users as well.
The bases of maintained propensities are evaluated when there are no such measured of established considerations in the aligned factors of implying the design and technological implications. These are the alignments which are measured in the course of providing the bases of ethical measures and considerations of well measured bases of operations. These are the factors of alignments which are maintained in the course of different perspectives which are to be weighed in the domains of assessing the bases of deployment and maintenance of different concrete and constructive domains.
The implications of production bases are aligned with the consideration of the rapid change in the notions of the technological implications. These are the distinctions that are necessary for the course of maintaining the stance of promotion and advancement updation. The suggestion is to be as précised and well structured in the distinctions of operations as possible. These alignments are going to provide the stance of sustainability in the consideration and build of development associated with the implications of policy and framework structuring. The establishment of these alignments is maintained with the weightage associated with the user base of ethical compliance and consideration of ease and well being.
Benois-Pineau, J. G.-D. (2017). THE ALGORIHTMS OF ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DEEP LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR THE RECOGNITION OF OBJECTS IN EGO-CENTERED VISUAL SCENES. RESEARCH IN HYBRID CONTROL OF NEURO-PROSTHETICS , 7.
Coeckelbergh, M., Pop, C., Simut, R., Peca, A., Pintea, S., David, D., et al. (2016). A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: Ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Science and engineering ethics , 47-65.
E.Schultz, A. l. (2018). The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework. sciencedirect , 823-832.
Potential for participatory big data ethics and algorithm design: a scoping mapping review. (2018). In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial-Volume , Volume 2 (pp. 1-6).
Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management , 1784-1810.
Stahl, B. C., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems , 152-161.
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good. Science , 751-752.
Tang, A., Tam, R., Cadrin-Chênevert, A., Guest, W., Chong, J., Barfett, J., et al. (2018). Canadian Association of Radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Canadian Association of Radiologists' Journal , 120-135.
Winfield, A. F., & Jirotka, M. (2018). Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 20180085.
Wright, S. A., & Schultz, A. E. (2018). The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework. Business Horizons , 823-832.
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Computer Science Assignment Help
5 Stars to their Experts for my Assignment Assistance.
There experts have good understanding and knowledge of university guidelines. So, its better if you take their Assistance rather than doing the assignments on your own.
What you will benefit from their service -
I saved my Time (which I utilized for my exam studies) & Money, and my grades were HD (better than my last assignments done by me)
What you will lose using this service -
Unfortunately, i had only 36 hours to complete my assignment when I realized that it's better to focus on exams and pass this to some experts, and then I came across this website.
Kudos Guys!Jacob "
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....