For the evaluation of the HIV strategy to be practical, enough evidence must be gathered from the relevant data sources. The school staffs are the program staff, while parents and students are the primary intended beneficiaries. Besides, school staffs are also HIV strategy implementers, the same to the program managers. Parents and students also can be part of the interest groups that are directly affected by HIV strategy. Without these key role players, the evaluation cannot be conducted, or if it is, it is done poorly. With the help of policy owners, policy implementers, interested groups, and the stakeholders, the HIV strategy evaluation will meet all the requirements; hence, identifying the intended use and users early on (Bardach, 2019).
The information that will enable the evaluation of this public policy to be done comes from the different sources of evidence. Existing information/evidence can be found through an online survey and the necessary school records. The current school records and online published materials are the primary sources of the existing evidence that will help high-quality strategy evaluation. Websites, journals, and relevant news on policy evaluation will also serve a significant source of secondary information. On the other hand, new information will be available on the ground. Such evidence will be extracted from the respondents when answering the questions from F2F interviews. F2F interview will offer appropriate scale and high-quality knowledge. These questions will not only empower evaluation participants to reply to inquiries friendly but also have a brilliant equivalent outline for the focused interviews.
The evaluation will utilize powerful methods for collecting and analyzing the information/evidence to appraise the assessment. F2F interviews and an online survey are collection methods, while thematic and descriptive statistics are analysis methods, respectively. The evaluation will adopt F2F meetings as one of the collection technique to perform this HIV strategy evaluation. F2F interviews will be allowed participants to freely participate, giving them better flexibility, influence, and, consequently, the chance to find more knowledge. These dialogues not only empower individuals to reply to inquiries friendly, but also have a brilliant equivalent outline for the focused interviews.
The evaluation reflects a discussion to be the furthermost powerful method for investigating varied and profound areas since the assessment will design and demonstrate exact queries to the topic in an individual earlier presenting rational interrogations. The evaluation will find different thoughts and philosophies from the collected raw points. The used approach is considered more significant in this evaluation, as it empowered the investigator to acquire a more detailed and more understanding view. An online survey will also be conducted to support the evidence collected from the F2F interviews. The online will be mainly gathered from the focused groups, school records, and other relevant websites that can provide useful information regarding HIV strategy evaluation.
Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics, on the other hand, will facilitate the data analysis process to better the information collected (Nichols et al., 2017). Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics analysis methods that this evaluation will implement is rationality assessments. The review anticipates acquiring a more reliable and credible data and truths established on fresh grounds. It is with the help of participants selected to participate in answering the F2F interview queries, as mentioned earlier in the data collection methods. The data will then be coded, processed, interpreted, and checked when transliterated. The technique of duplicating the discussions will enable the evaluation to attain a piece of more comprehensive information regarding the evaluation uses and users (De-xin 2018). After that, the evidence will be veiled once the whole set of evidence is transcribed in full. Appropriate encryptions are identifiers to be used when classifying or assemblage evidence, as are an essential part of thematic analysis.
Specific encryption will be used evaluation to the use that will develop. Following will be the breakdown of the evidence in the procedure by identifying recurrent designs and emphasizing strengths and weaknesses. The data test will comprise a rationality test technique through studying records and encryptions, thus permitting evaluation to confirm or modify a HIV strategy that has already been evaluated and developed. Those evidence investigation techniques are considered to deliver the most excellent excellence outcomes of the HIV strategy evaluation and therefore, an improved decision on the public policy evaluation.
Confidentiality of the collection is the common challenge that this evaluation expects to face. To succeed in safeguarding this information, from both F2F interviews and an online survey, confidentiality will be given priority to ensure that no unauthorized member or staff access this HIV strategy evaluation evidence. Authentication will be in place, and verification will be required for every attempt to login and access this information.
After the evidence has been successfully gathered, it is time to plan for the stakeholders to be engaged and how the report will be reported to the concerned. Anticipating the barriers to the use of evaluation, recognizing the intended users and intended purposes of assessment early on, and identifying the key processes and times when findings are required are the strategies to be used. All of these strategies will effectively enhance the use of HIV strategy evaluation. They help to oversee the whole process of the evaluation use and how it can be managed for future purposes.
During the use of this evaluation, several barriers emerge from various source e.g., internal and external sources. For the domestic, it could be from the staff criticizing the credibility of the evaluation. On the outer part, parents and students as intended users can perceive the review negatively. Identifying these barriers will enable the resources and authority to implement variations in response to negative and positive critics. Moreover, it will make it possible to plan for ways that will overcome or reduce these obstacles. E.g., the use data rehearsal method will establish what will organize reliable evidence when designing the evaluation use.
When the evaluation is under usage, identified uses and users help move straight with the chosen methods for data collection and experienced practitioners. It is a widely used strategy as it includes guidance for creating terms of reference for evaluation. Stating the primary intended users clearly and considering whether the public reporting of evaluation results may be used. I.e., encouraging public officials to bring out their findings. Providing a plan for accommodating the emerging uses and users could be a good idea to enhance the use of the HIV strategy evaluation. An additional aspect of being identified is effective use, where the review is intended to inform a specific decision. E.g., making improvements, continuation, expansion, or enlightenment use.
Keeping on track on the key processes and times the findings are needed is an essential strategy. It helps to consider a series of analysis and reporting cycles. It will offer the chance to develop thoughtful and obligation to utilize results accurately. Moreover, it will help this HIV strategy evaluation succeed because it will be designed to deliver results and uses it early to inform significant decisions. The leading judgment facts and procedures recognized will provide the effectiveness of appraisal bits of intelligence and events. Organizing these uses, users, key points, processes, and timing will enhance the use of this HIV strategy evaluation (Bryson, 2018).
Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. M. (2019). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. CQ press.
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
De-xin, T. I. A. N. (2018). A Hands-on Approach Towards the Application of Research Methods in Academic Paper Writing. Journalism, 8(4), 196-214.
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., ... & Proal, E. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature neuroscience, 20(3), 299-303.
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Economics Assignment Help
5 Stars to their Experts for my Assignment Assistance.
There experts have good understanding and knowledge of university guidelines. So, its better if you take their Assistance rather than doing the assignments on your own.
What you will benefit from their service -
I saved my Time (which I utilized for my exam studies) & Money, and my grades were HD (better than my last assignments done by me)
What you will lose using this service -
Unfortunately, i had only 36 hours to complete my assignment when I realized that it's better to focus on exams and pass this to some experts, and then I came across this website.
Kudos Guys!Jacob "
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....