• Subject Name : International Economy

A Simple Analysis of Openness for Argentina and El Salvador

Content

Trade Openness.

Trade Openness.

Correlation coefficient

Technical Analysis.

Comparative Advantage.

Reference

Trade Openness

Commercial transparency can also be described as a number of imports and exports separated by gross domestic product (Le, T.H., et al. 2016). In several other terms, business transparency is the meaning of the inclination of an entire economy favourable exchange can also have a beneficial effect on the nation's entire economic development. Estimated utilizing theorems below:

Trade Openness = Exports + product and services imports / Gross domestic product

Trade Openness

In the above-mentioned diagram of trade transparency, it is analyzed that El Salvador's trade transparency will be at its all-time high, which accounted for Sixty percent of all its Gross domestic product and had been nearly 3 times much more than Argentina.

graph shows Trade Openness

Figure 1: Trade Openness

The year 2002 was perhaps the glorious moment for Argentina as trade openness was still in its height and hit 40% of its GDP, and afterwards, in the periods 2003-2007 to come, this was stagnant and once again began to fall until 2014, and that was a poor indicator for Argentina in respect of imports and exports proportion of its GDP. Roughly half of the trade openness dropped within the year that decided to increase throughout the years ahead and hit 50% of its GDP in 2014. Therefore, it is often claimed how El Salvador's total importing and exporting performance is much more in excess of its GDP to Argentina, which indicates that El Salvador's economy has done much stronger than Argentina throughout past years (Keho, Y., 2017).

Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient indicates the directional correlation that can be taken either positively or negatively (Keho, Y., 2017). A positive coefficient of correlationsuggests that as the certain parameter value rises, another parameter's valuation always continues to increase since one reduces the other. Argentina and El Salvador's coefficient correlation is positive which indicates that when market openness rises, per capita GDP tends to increase as well. Argentina's coefficient correlation is 0.87 and that for El Salvador is 0.95, that suggests El Salvador's efficiency has become much higher than Argentina (Huchet‐Bourdon,. et. al., 2018).

Argentina and El Salvador's trade transparency fluctuates between 1998 to 2014, owing to importing and exporting shifts in services and goods. Trade openness continues to play an essential part in boosting the economy's lengthy-term productivity by enabling more effective distribution of resources and making more adequate use of the expenditure for nation development & advancement (Yanikkaya, H. and Altun, A., 2018).

Technical Analysis

Argentina has the utter benefit of Hammer because its labor can produce 4 hammers at a moment so that cumulative employees can manufacture 50 * 4=200 hammers while El Salvador can manufacture only 2 hammers at a period so that entire county labor can generate just 75 * 2=150 hammers. In Widgets, El Salvador has an utter benefit because of its excessive amount of labor.

The labors will yield 75 * 2=150.

Comparative Advantage

Argentina has a comparative advantage for hammers because on Widgets EI Salvador has.

c. Production possibility curve

graphs shows Production possibility curve

d. Assume both countries' total revenue is $1 and both allocate half of each revenue towards both of the items, so 0.50 cents will be used to purchase Hammer and 0.50 cents of remaining will be required to purchase Widgets. So, for both nations the autarky price level of Widgets is the cost of Widgets separated by Hammer cost, i.e., 0.50/0.50 = $1.

e. Argentina's optimum output and use will be Hammer since it has absolute and competitive advantage in manufacturing Hammer. On the other side, the optimum output will be a Gadget for El Salvador.

Reference

Huchet‐Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C. and Vijil, M., 2018. The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, 41(1), pp.59-76.

Keho, Y., 2017. The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), p.1332820.

Le, T.H., Chang, Y. and Park, D., 2016. Trade openness and environmental quality: International evidence. Energy policy, 92, pp.45-55.

Yanikkaya, H. and Altun, A., 2018. Once Again, Trade Openness and Growth: Are Trade in Value Added Concepts Different? (No. 2018-01). Gebze Technical University, Department of Economics.

Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our International Economics Assignment Help

Get It Done! Today

Upload your assignment
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts

Highlights

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total

    Free
  • Let's Start

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore MASS
Order Now

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assignment help

refresh