Join the Premium Student Club @Zero Cost!
Get Assignment Done by MAS Certified Experts
Flat 50% Off on Assignment Bookings
Answer 1) As per Ontario Court of Appeals, the main goal is to apply with the variety of sources that can follow the common clauses of the conclusion such as the: (1) to have the review of the case law that is relevant federal along with the provincial statutes. It follows the Canadian Charter of Rights. The Ontario Court of Appeals follows the court office and to show the proof of the services, that can help to examine the prosecutor's office and to access the order, that can notably be appealing and be reliable (Mills, 2017). The Ontario Court of Appeal allows us to follow and even understand the findings in a corrective manner, that can help to solve the purpose and time. As per the Canadian Charter of Rights, it is important to follow the appeal and to determine the change and the course of the change in the judge's decision. The decision making can help to identify the new trial or hearing. It is important to follow the decision stands. It is important to understand the person that can appeals that can follow the judge's interpretation of the law that can determine the result of the fact (International Labour Law Reports, 2019).
Answer 2) Sharpe, J. A., has mentioned that as per the Court of Appeal, it is important to follow the common law that can be recognized with the common law on account of the privacy invasion and can follow the tort of invasion with the declared interest of time. The law has recognized the relevant expertise and even access the rights of the action that can be linked to the breach of privacy and following the rights of action, that remains unchanged. The common law should aim to recognize the tort of the invasion of privacy that would be based on the 120 years (Weinrib, 2016). The importance of the common law, that can conclude determine of action for breach of privacy that would account to the uncertainty. It is important to determine the tort of invasion of privacy that has been distinguishing over the four distinct torts tied that can be tied with the common theme. It is also opposed over the single tort, and can be identified over the classification that can present the four torts as follows-:
As the bank person, Ms. Tsige can provide access to Ms. Jones' bank account, that she has looked for the more than 170 times in four years. Ms. Tsige has not even published, distribute or record the information in any possible manner. As Ms. Jones has become suspicious that has confronted Ms. Tsige who admit to checking the banking records, and explain that she was involved in the financial dispute with Ms. Jones’ former husband and to seek and inquire about the child support (Fauteux, 2019).
As per the Ontario law, the issue was central to the appeal and to dismiss Jones’ claim under the tort of breach of privacy.
Based on the law of motions court judge has come in support and existence for the tort of invasion of privacy and to claim it in the writing, that such cases are supported by the Ontario Superior Court refused with actions on the pleadings stage (Fauteux 2019),
Answer 3) In Presley v Van Dusen, the Court of Appeal has identified the problem of the discoverability dealt with and it is the common case that can review the elements, for the analyzing discoverability and can be used under section 5 of the Limitations Act, 2002. It would include the "appropriate means" test, and it can discuss as to what kind of professional relationships one can address with reasonable reliance [Presley v Van Dusen].
In McDowell v. Fortress Real Capital Inc., the Court of Appeal it has also overturned the chain of events with the motion judge's decision that can strike with the claims of a proposed class. It is important to understand the various allegations that can conclude the misconduct. It is important to relate with the Court that can identify the law about the personal liability and it would be based on the corporate acts, that can seal contract rule along with experiencing the rights of beneficiaries of the trust that can assert the claims that belong to the trustee [McDowell v. Fortress Real Capital Inc.,]
Answer 4) The Court of Appeal can be identified with the tort classification and o it can be handled with observed that it was important to maintain the appropriate analytical distinction between the categories to avoid confusion (Fauteux, 2019).
Relevant to this case was number 1, which the Court observed had been defined within the United States in the Restatement (Second) of Torts (2010). it is important to intentional and intrudes with the physical or the seclusion based on another private affair or concerns, It is important to handle the subject to liability and can be solved with the invasion of privacy, As per the invasion, it is important to overcome the problem of the offensive account to the reasonable person.
Based on the Court of Ontario, it is important to find it challenging with the right course of action with the privacy invasion. It can be based on the state that can follow the damages for invasion of privacy and interpret the plaintiff that has suffered from no pecuniary loss that can be deemed to be modest. it can be marked as the wrong did and we find out damages at $20,000 (Fauteux, 2019). The court would not hold on to the aggravated or punitive damages, that can award and be based on exceptional cases.
Fauteux, G., & Pollock, S. (2019). Trust in the Statute: Ontario Court of Appeal Confirms Provincial Statutes Can Satisfy the Common Law Definition of a Trust. Banking & Finance Law Review, 34(3), 475-481.
International Labour Law Reports Online, E. Canada: Ontario Court of Appeal Heller v. Uber 2019 ONCA 1. International Labour Law Reports Online, 38(1), 93-111.
Mills, M. E., & de Rijcke, I. (2017). Geomatics and the Law\Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc.—Ontario Court of Appeal Finds in Favour of Crown Copyright in Survey Plans. GEOMATICA, 71(3), 155-157.
Weinrib, R. S., McCamus, J., Hall, G., & Robinson, S. While this book was in press, the case of Heller v Uber Technologies Inc was reversed by the Ontario Court of Appeal, 2019 ONCA 1.
McDowell v. Fortress Real Capital Inc.
Presley v Van Dusen, Inc.
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Law Assignment Help
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....