CSOs that have been selected from the previous assignment were Bush Heritage Australia, Australia Koala Foundation, and Kyeema Foundation. Concerning the funding, Bush Heritage Australia is dependent on funds through the donations along with support and also individual partnerships (BUSH Heritage, 2020). The management of the CSO in the context of the culture had gone through a shared journey of respect for diversity by enduring the relationship to the land and waters that is the preservation of the natural resources. However, the organization had faced challenges in both protecting and connecting the landscapes along with waterways for the plants, animals as well as people. In this situation, the organization could be more concerned (Hudson, 2009).
On the contrary, the other CSO that is the Australian Koala foundation heavily dependent on supportive organizations and individuals. To maintain the independent voice, the management of the organization did not accept the funds from the governments. However, this particular CSO had contributed very little towards the pause of the natural habitat, and hence there had occurred a massive decrease of Koalas. On the other hand, the management of the Kyeema Foundation manages its funding through the Australian NGO Co-operation Programme (Hudson, 2009).
In the context of values, Bush Heritage made collaboration with traditional owners and also set their strategies to make collaborate with the stakeholder and communities based on which the organizational culture can get well uplifted. However, the Australian Koala Foundation had managed themselves in eructing different institutions to conserve the Koalas and in this way, they wanted to manage the values of their organization (Koala Foundation, 2020).
Through the assessment, it has been found that the three CSO’s main purpose is to conserve and preserve the natural resources of the environment and for that, they are working on different perspectives and strategies to develop faster and accurate decisions. Again, in this matter, Kyeema Foundations had also tried hard in collaborating with different governmental institutions based on which they can be able to uphold the competency levels and communities with proper integrity and transparency.
Now in the context of the Stakeholder Analysis, the employees under the Bush Heritage in Australia work along with around 1000 people. Based on this, the actual resources can get utilized properly, and this way the works carried over. However, for the Koala Foundation, in the context of stakeholder analysis, the workers always feel energetic and positive to work in different domains and always thrived to save the Koalas. As per the Kyeema Foundation, the Australian Volunteers there had made a positive contribution by working hand in hand with the diverse workforces having different talents to achieve the greatest outcome without any fear (Kyeema Foundation, 2020).
It can be stated that the management of Bush Australia in the context of the stakeholder analysis, had reflected good practice governance and had avoided the complexities in every stage like always worked with volunteers and partners to achieve a common goal in the future. Hence better impact had generated for this CSO where it endured better relations with the employees. However, in the context of managing powers, it is recommended to Bush Australia to have better director panels with certain advisory groups based on which better planning for the future regarding the workforce management and strategic partnership goals can be set, creating a positive impact on the CSO. However the CSO,Bush Australia is having better advisory panels with the help of which it can able to co-ordinate the preparation of the strategic plan along with effective investigation and greater governance procedures. It had completed its works through different committees like finance committees, audit committees, compliance committees, etc.
On the other hand, Koala Foundation in Australia is not professional enough in handling the managerial decisions within the organization and therefore should manage the staff and should also generate adequate training facilities for them so that they can be able to serve adequate ethical and legal responsibilities. But in the context of governance, the CSO is efficient and competent in ensuring adequate financial viability along with resolving the conflicts and appointing the chief executives to set risk policies and undertaking legal responsibilities (Hudson, 2009).
Kyeema Foundation in this context is having the compliances and the strategic vision to set their targeted goals and at the same time to achieve them through effective team management which will be having a positive impact on the board as well as on the managerial approaches. The employees in the CSO in the context of stakeholder analysis work with proper accountability and objectivity so that the goals can be readily achieved with honesty and effective leadership functioning.
It is important to undergo critical discussions where the prime responsibility of CSOs is to manage the environment sustainably and along with that categorizing the works with better governance and powerful managerial aspects. This is important to check the lacking weakness and the strong points of the CSOs along with the opportunities for the future. The purpose to do critical analysis is to reflect the lags of the CSOs and hence recommended them towards improvement. This way, the problems can be well addressed along with effective as well as professional performances.
BUSH Heritage. (2020, August 31). Our values & constitution. Retrieved from https://www.bushheritage.org.au/who-we-are/about/values
Hudson, M. (2009). Managing Without Profit: Leadership, Management & Governance of Third-Sector Organisations in Australia (3 ed.). Sydney: University of NSW Press.
Koala Foundation. (2020, August 31). Policy and Planning. Retrieved from https://www.savethekoala.com/our-work/policy-and-planning
Kyeema Foundation. (2020, August 31). OUR IMPACT. Retrieved from https://kyeemafoundation.org/
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Management Assignment Help
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....