Greer John Wealth Management Pty Ltd is an advanced organization with a very powerful base of consumers in the context of making their investments. The customers also trusted the organization in terms of making any kind of investment. The concerned organization is known to be central network for taking care of credentials along with investments of its customers. The platform was developed in the year 2000 and it was a fore-front development of that time. The gigantic platform had proved to be very much efficient for both the commercial activities as well as to meet the requirements of its customers. However, due to changing condition and with the passage of time, the leaders of the organization find the need to evaluate the technology-based plan of action for the company and determine the prospects of using a cloud-based system.
The main purpose of the report is to determine the microservice infrastructure element of transforming into the cloud platform. In the first part of the report the discussion would be about the various advantages, an organization will experience on shifting from their colossal infrastructure to a micro-service platform. In the second part of the report the discussion would be about the important component of the microservices infrastructure. Moreover, it will also discuss about the requirements that needs to be considered in terms of breaking the gigantic platform into the microservices platform. Furthermore, it will also discuss about the advantages obtained from the process of service modelling. In the final part of the report the concept of DevOps would be elucidated along with the development and the testing procedures that would be needed to execute the DevOps in the concerned organization.
Microservices constructions assists the rapid groups in moving at a great pace and also to make sure that the complete doesn’t come to a halt in case of an intrusion of any condemning virus. Microservices is known to be a cloud-based architectural perspective, wherein only one application is used and which consists of several generally paired elements as well as individually outsourced small elements or even provisions (Fritzsch et al., 2018).
Here are the few services it includes:
Microservices has a great potential of being famous choice among the employees, project heads of an organization as well as among its builders. This is known to be an uncommon attribute of microservices as its constructional fanatism is mostly meant for the original creators of the concerned services. The key reason here is that it depicts the manner in which several commercial leaders aims to formulate as well as operate those working under him as well as its enriching procedures. Hence, microservices are known to be an architecture-based theory that provides the needed functional theory in a much better manner (Jabbari et al., 2016).
In this context, the Greer John Wealth Management organization will have the following benefits if they move from the monolithic construction to the microservices construction:
Additionally, it even needs to be noted that the pace of the operations in an organization is not the only advantage offered by the microservice. However, it is a generally developing organizational theory that will integrate the multi-operational team of an organization to resolve an issue, provision or even a commodity of a commercial activity (Newman, 2017). In this context, a microservice theory best fits the business inclination as it will allow a company to build a small, multi-operational group in terms of a provision or a series of provisions and also make them function a rapid style. Ultimately, the reduced magnitude of the provisions in integration with their specific restrictions and style of interacting, enables it to be simpler for the members of the concerned group to apprehend the location of the codes and add to it at a faster pace. This demonstrates a precise set of advantages both in terms of its operating pace as well as in terms of the confidence of the employees.
Since the executive leadership team of the Greer John Wealth company is in quest of new techniques to meet the digital requirements of its customers, it is required to have a user design considering several important elements. It should take into consideration the videos, attributes, orders, writing advertising copy, data construction among many others. It is important for the frameworks to be made in an appropriate manner and also to combine all the components to provide a complete experience to its customers. It is significant for the concerned organization to execute the same in their service design, so that they are able to provide an enhanced level of experience to their customers as the technology evolves with the passage of time.
Here are the three elements of Service Design:
The Greer John Wealth Management company can enjoy the following benefits if they use service models like of SaaS ( Software as a Service):
It is referred to as a series of functions that integrates the building of software as well as the different IT functions. It works towards the process of shortening the building life cycle of the system and offers constant delivery of great standard software (Zhu et al., 2016).
In the build stage, the concerned organization would be required to handle the process of software development, that is the wealth management products in this context. Moreover, it will even manage the different update of the software and will apply automatic techniques to arrange the codes for the upcoming emission to the process of development. Example, Docker, Puppet and Chef. In the testing stage, the concerned organization would be required to conduct multiple tests both manually as well as automatically to make sure that the code is of the best standard. Example, Junit, Vagrant and TestNG (Brunnert et al., 2015).
Through this report it can be concluded that the Greer John Wealth Management company is recommended to shift into microservices architecture from a monolith platform. In this way they will be able meet the changing requirements of their customers with the changes in technology that is taking place in the current world. It has been determined that it is important for the concerned organization to have microservice architecture if they want to want to continue to accurately handle the accounts as well as the investment of their customers. Moreover, it has also been determined that by implementing the microservice architecture the concerned organization can enhance the speed of its outsourcing procedure since it is executed at an individual level. Furthermore, it has been determined that if the Greer John Wealth Management organization wants to shift to the microservice architecture, it would be required to have a simple perspective along with a fairly distributed potential.
Additionally, it will also be required on the part of the organization to disconnect the core components of their business as well as those aspects that transforms with the changing needs of the technologies. The concerned organization is recommended to make use of the SaaS-based service model as it would be more feasible for the organization with no charges involved in signing up for the software. The company is also recommended to make use of the DevOps that will reduce the development time-line of the platform and continuously provide effective software to the organization. Hence, the DevOps will manage the development of the wealth management commodities for the organization along with various revisions taking place.
Balalaie, A., Heydarnoori, A., & Jamshidi, P. (2016). Microservices architecture enables devops: Migration to a cloud-native architecture. Ieee Software, 33(3), 42-52. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7436659
Aderaldo, C. M., Mendonça, N. C., Pahl, C., & Jamshidi, P. (2017, May). Benchmark requirements for microservices architecture research. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Establishing the Community-Wide Infrastructure for Architecture-Based Software Engineering (ECASE) (pp. 8-13). IEEE. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7968049
Kalske, M., Mäkitalo, N., & Mikkonen, T. (2017, June). Challenges when moving from monolith to microservice architecture. In International Conference on Web Engineering (pp. 32-47). Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-74433-9_3
Long, H., Wang, W., Li, T., & Ru, H. (2017). Hierarchically bimodal mesoporous silica fibers as building units for silica monolith with trimodal porous architecture. Ceramics International, 43(2), 2174-2181. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272884216319976
Chen, R., Li, S., & Li, Z. (2017, December). From monolith to microservices: a dataflow-driven approach. In 2017 24th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) (pp. 466-475). IEEE. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8305969
Newman, S. (2019). Monolith to Microservices: Evolutionary Patterns to Transform Your Monolith. O'Reilly Media. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nNa_DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Monolith+architecture&ots=eg1S1yuecH&sig=-6h6MAAEGCPqA9bzUm3CeibBYCE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Monolith%20architecture&f=false
Mishra, M., Kunde, S., & Nambiar, M. (2018, September). Cracking the monolith: Challenges in data transitioning to cloud native architectures. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings (pp. 1-4). Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3241403.3241440
Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Zimmermann, A., & Wagner, S. (2018, March). From monolith to microservices: a classification of refactoring approaches. In International Workshop on Software Engineering Aspects of Continuous Development and New Paradigms of Software Production and Deployment (pp. 128-141). Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-06019-0_10
Wang, Y., He, Q., & Yang, Y. (2015, June). QoS-aware service recommendation for multi-tenant SaaS on the cloud. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (pp. 178-185). IEEE. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7207351
Zhu, H., Bayley, I., Younas, M., Lightfoot, D., Yousef, B., & Liu, D. (2015, June). Big saas: The next step beyond big data. In 2015 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (pp. 775-784). IEEE. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7207313
Vavere, E. (2019). Investigating the usefulness of structural equation modelling for service quality in a SaaS delivery model. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7353/6e1ad85bfc8034f6b4d8207c061ee10e4cf4.pdf
Ebert, C., Gallardo, G., Hernantes, J., & Serrano, N. (2016). DevOps. Ieee Software, 33(3), 94-100. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7458761
Zhu, L., Bass, L., & Champlin-Scharff, G. (2016). DevOps and its practices. IEEE Software, 33(3), 32-34. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7458765
Brunnert, A., van Hoorn, A., Willnecker, F., Danciu, A., Hasselbring, W., Heger, C., ... & Koziolek, A. (2015). Performance-oriented DevOps: A research agenda. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04752. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04752
Jabbari, R., bin Ali, N., Petersen, K., & Tanveer, B. (2016, May). What is DevOps? A systematic mapping study on definitions and practices. In Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016 (pp. 1-11). Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2962695.2962707
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Architecture Assignment Help
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....