Kure, J. (2016). Conscientious Objection in health care. Journal of Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 2016, 6 (3–4), pp: 173-180.
This journal clearly depicts that the word ‘Conscientious Objection’ seems quite easily to pronounce but it’s quite tough in actual regards. In medical profession, Conscientious Objection means to restrict the hands from offering quality medical services to the society. Doing so can prove extremely troublesome thereby causing harm to the moral values and norms of the people of the society. In contrast to the latter statement, it can be stated that although conscientious objection, is a human right still it cannot be used as it is against health professional. Despite of this, the concept is arousing in the entire globe and now a days had become one of the burning issues all round the world. Thus, the prime aim of this paper is to analyse the impact of conscientious objection in any healthcare system in the current situation.
Since, the First World War the concept of conscientious objection is incorporating itself within the minds of the healthcare professionals. In regard to this, the case of primary abortion as well as contraception is directly avoided by the medical practitioners spotlighting that its against their principles. However, this activity of abortion proved quite effective for the modern society as it helped in safeguarding the female generation of the humanity. In view of the fact that, such types of conscientious objection is integrated within the constitutional rights also. Other than this, the journal also highlighted the issue of conscientious objection in case of patients with transmittable disorders such as AIDS. Along with this, freezing of gametes or embryos, surrogate motherhood reproduction for lesbian and gay people etc are some of the examples in which, conscientious objection is viewed efficiently. Such conscientious claims of the doctors or nurses are entirely based on religious norms and integrity. But, keeping this aspect in mind, the author questioned that, whether accurate medical treatment is presented to the patients by the medical personnel.
To answer this question, it is described that in recent times, the patients are becoming the primary aspect and the doctors are playing the role of serviceman of health care. This means that, the belief of conscientious objection fits within the framework of the society but works as per the preference of the dominating principle i.e. patients. Hence, it has become quite challenging for the medical providers to retain conscientious objection as patient sovereignty attained a principle role in therapeutic morals. Against the latter statement, it can be discussed that the ability and judging quality of a physician is extremely essential for any sort of medical decision making. According to this line, it is portrayed that a physician is entirely free to implement the right of conscientious objection, if such proves beneficial for the patient. For example: death of a human embryo or miscarriage is strictly prohibited in this times since, it leads to the betterment of humanity or the world.
Apart from this, the ethics lying behind conscientious objection is that its against the healthcare acts or norms to offer certain medical treatment to the patients. Similarly, certain information regarding healing is directly prohibited as it can harm the human civilization. Hence, it can be evaluated that the word conscientious objection presents negative response but its also creates positive impact. Considering these lines, it can be questioned that whether conscientious objection is highly compatible with the medical practitioner’s decision. However, it can be explained that to some extent, conscientious objection is directly accurate with the practitioners verdict but in other situations it remains unmatched. Therefore, it can be examined that though conscientious objection is against the medical laws still in some extent it is effective as well. If such is not maintained then, it could affect the well-being of the world and the structure can also get altered. For example; if the rate of abortion is not banned then the balance of males and females within the society could get disturbed and it can arise numerous problems. So, the thought of conscientious objection is accurate in certain regards and it does not hamper the medical laws.
Conclusively, it can be briefed from the above mentioned lines that conscientious objection is a technique to offer actual treatment but it cannot be implemented as a tool of discrimination in social standards.
Kure, J. (2016). Conscientious objection in health care. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311977615_Conscientious_objection_in_health_care
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Philosophy Assignment Help
5 Stars to their Experts for my Assignment Assistance.
There experts have good understanding and knowledge of university guidelines. So, its better if you take their Assistance rather than doing the assignments on your own.
What you will benefit from their service -
I saved my Time (which I utilized for my exam studies) & Money, and my grades were HD (better than my last assignments done by me)
What you will lose using this service -
Unfortunately, i had only 36 hours to complete my assignment when I realized that it's better to focus on exams and pass this to some experts, and then I came across this website.
Kudos Guys!Jacob "
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....