Binge-watching, commonly called binge-viewing, is the custom of watching TV over a long period of time, typically a single TV program. Binge viewing marks a new age in television-watching ac-tivity among young people. Smartphones and laptops are the most common devices used for binge TV watching (Walton et al., 2018). It has been found that an excessive watching of any show can also adversely affect the other aspects of our life. It's linked to characteristics like fatigue, poor sleep quality, insomnia, and some mood disturbance. Some studies also suggest a potential link with depression, isolation, and lack of self-regulation. This study analyses the aspect of Binge watching TV as an increasingly problem in society. The purpose of this research was to estimate the TV binge viewing frequency and to identify modifiable factors associated with that viewing.
Binge viewing is a fairly recent form of behaviour, which can have implications on health. The fo-cus of this study is to evaluate the level of TV binge watching and to define factors that are modifia-ble linked with it (Wang et al., 2017). During the past week a 85 participants finished an online sur-vey measuring proximal goals, result aspirations, expected disappointment, self-efficacy, automatic-ity, aim disagreement and task assistance, and binge watch that is self-reported. Participants regis-tered a mean 1.52 days per week binge watch. Binge watching variation accounted for aim and re-sult preferences, and automaticity, expected disappointment and target conflict each separately con-sidered for added variation in marathon watching (Walton et al., 2018). Binge tracking is prevalent and related to both objective and impulsive causes. Predominant behavioural models rely in turn on one particular behaviour. Despite their popularity, these viewpoints are not compatible with day-to-day experiences of multiple achievement of goals, where the achievement of common goal com-petes for scarce energy and time resources.
Number of researches have manifested that there is a strong correlation between conflict of goal and facilitation of goal with health behaviours, that is, the negative and constructive impact of the other objectives pursued with a behaviour of target. Conversely, binge watching has a clashing and/or motivating effect on the achievement of else wise personal goals. Automaticity, expected remorse, and target conflict and facilitation provide poten-tially useful frameworks to better explain binge watching far from conventional theory influences. The research hypothesized that variation in binge viewing would be further accounted for when monitoring constructs from SCT by: automaticity, expected regret, and target conflict and task facil-itation (Trouleau et al., 2016). The results demonstrate that automaticity, expected remorse and competing expectations all add to account for variation in binge viewing above normal cognitive social influences. Prompting expected contrition has resulted to be an simple but efficient interven-tion strategy in else wise settings, as well as provided its anticipating ability, it can provide chances to curb binge watching bouts.
Binge viewing has been self-reported, and may indicate bias. Future work may consider how to collect more realistic binge-watching metrics. Further systematic and comprehensive research into binge viewing is warranted (Walton et al., 2018). This may include the use of comprehensive binge tracking methods like ecological transitory appraisal, contexture sound identification, and collaboration with Software-based or streaming businesses surveillance. More research in binge watching may differentiate between TV show-particular variables like gender, du-ration, real-time and on-demand services, as well as contextual variables and evaluate the correla-tion between outcomes of health and binge watching like, eating, sleep hygiene and physical activ-ity (Shim et al., 2018). Watching TV binge is a new habit many practice at least once a week. Binge watching is not only correlated with traditional social cognitive influences, but also expected re-morse, automaticity and contradictory expectations of goals.
The goal of this study will be to build on the literature surrounding this study's core themes. This will begin by discussing the current state of the television landscape, then go back to how appoint-ment television evolved from the network era, explore how modern viewing trends began, and ana-lyze the binge-watching boom (De et al., 2016). This research studies the literature and previous re-search on the reception of viewer variables such as the effect of binge viewing on people. Recently the media world has been fostering a atmosphere of change. Matrix. (2014), identified the influx of new technology as an indication of the evolving nature of television in the early twenty-first cen-tury. It's not just the box that sits in the living room any more — the television screen has expanded across countless avenues. Matrix. (2014), also clarified how modern technologies and apps relate to evolving TV watching habits that provide customisation, navigation and power. The modern TV audience enjoys unparalleled flexibility and power a direct product of widespread availability of new technologies and services.
Cultivated in this modern television landscape is the binge watching trend, a common piece of discussion in the current zeitgeist but an academically much under-re-searched subject. Binge watching is a new phenomenon, ripe for study and while its increasing pop-ularity and frequency of use has been the subject of many media company studies, there is very lit-tle empirical research on the issue. Much remains to be discussed with respect to its impact on tele-vision audience and reception of a series (Jenner, 2017). Binge watching, also known as binge watching or marathon viewing, is the modern trend of watching several episodes of a single series during a prolonged time span. The new practice encourages audiences to skip entire seasons on lin-ear TV, in order to watch them all at their convenience at once. Binge watching provides a modern choice for audiences of a sort of immediate gratification Binge watching has defied conventional television habits and broken the norm of watching a series on a set schedule for a fixed period of time (Pittman & Sheehan, 2015). This also empowers the user of television with a newfound free-dom and preference. In daily vernacular the word binge-watch has become so popular that it was added into the Oxford English Dictionary in 2013. It was also a runner-up for the word of the year, which in recent times underlined the major influence.. Binge watching has also been a practice pro-moted when suggesting a series to others.
Watching binge on television is a common phenomenon which is a part of each individual , once a week. Marathon watching linked not only with conventional collective cognitive elements yet also with anticipated target guilt, conflicting and automaticity perceptions. Arbitration aimed at binge watching to minimize sedentary time will benefit from addressing positive and impulsive mecha-nisms to improve behaviour. This study was able to take important and substantial steps against the recently famous but under-researched binge-watching television trend. The primary result of this research experiment was that the series is dependent on the impact of binge viewing on audience reception. Binge TV-watching is marking a new age in youth TV-watching behaviour.
de Feijter, D., Khan, V. J., & van Gisbergen, M. (2016, June). Confessions of a'guilty'couch potato understanding and using context to optimize binge-watching behavior. In Proceedings of the ACM International conference on interactive experiences for TV and online video (pp. 59-67).
Jenner, M. (2016). Is this TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and binge-watching. New media & society, 18(2), 257-273.
Matrix, S. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 6(1), 119-138.
Mikos, L. (2016). Digital media platforms and the use of TV content: Binge watching and video-on-demand in Germany. Media and Communication, 4(3), 154-161.
Jenner, M. (2017). Binge-watching: Video-on-demand, quality TV and mainstreaming fandom. In-ternational Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(3), 304-320.
Pittman, M., & Sheehan, K. (2015). Sprinting a media marathon: Uses and gratifications of binge-watching television through Netflix. First Monday, 20(10).
Shim, H., & Kim, K. J. (2018). An exploration of the motivations for binge-watching and the role of individual differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 94-100.
Trouleau, W., Ashkan, A., Ding, W., & Eriksson, B. (2016, August). Just one more: Modeling binge watching behavior. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1215-1224).
Wang, X., Girdhar, R., & Gupta, A. (2017). Binge watching: Scaling affordance learning from sit-coms. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2596-2605).
Walton-Pattison, E., Dombrowski, S. U., & Presseau, J. (2018). ‘Just one more episode’: Frequency and theoretical correlates of television binge watching. Journal of health psychology, 23(1), 17-24.
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Psychology Assignment Help
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....