Sarah was a senior staff member, engaged in children development through a depth of knowledge and insight. From the case study, it can opine that there is a lack of communication between Sarah and the writer. Sarah is implementing unethical practices in the centre that unknowingly or by mistake. Sometime her attitude becomes distinct with the children, staff, or her colleagues. These have an impact on everyday actions, decision making, and all over concerned person. According to code of ethics, children, families, and community need to follow a vital accountability.
The dilemma between Sarah is gender representation. As she still believes in stereotyping. She hates the people who were open-minded. She is a victim of homophobic hate group and believes in self.
For writer, the dilemma exists when Sarah’s word and actions “their blood will be on their head” haunted the writer. This disturb the writer and he questioned himself that what the fact Sarah think of himself and his sexual orientation. Through this, he is in dilemma on how to implant the professional decision making and action.
Sarah is highly committed towards racial diversity in centre’s program. She is highly curious to inculcate gender and sexuality into curriculum. She has a problem with the male counterpart to work in place where women do much better. Due to this nature of Sarah, it sometime hinders the interaction of children with their senior placement students. She involve herself deeply in improvising rules on children and sometime forget their right However, according to ECA, there must be respectful, responsive, and reciprocal relationships must be central to children’s education and care. However, Sarah imposes her decision on children and other staff members.
Sarah has expanded his disbelief on gender biasness. He started interfering in each child activities. For instance, on the drama day, she does not allowed Feng to wear dresses on the view that His father does not allow Feng to refrain from these kinds of occasions. These interference, obstructing, and putting limitations on children is not good. As it effect the mental development of the young minds and diminish the actual child need to explore hisor her identity. According to ECA, the educator in centre program must create, maintain, meaningful curriculum to enrich the children learning, balancing his/her need, and enhance their relation through social interactions (Early Childhood Australia).
Placement student is affected by Sarah’s attitude because of her confusing behaviour. She develops the behaviour of interference, regular taunting, and imposing work on other without considering their views and actions.
Professional values: Sarah has ranked a distinction award in centre program. She has a good professional belief, values and administration. She has develop a professional identify with her beliefs and work experience. Through this, she ensures the racial, ethnic, linguistic, and cultural diversity within the organization. Moreover, according to ECA, the professional values, knowledge, and practice are responsible for the positive contribution and profession toward the centre, organisation and society (Early Childhood Australia).
Professional issues: Sarah’s interrupted behaviour may interfere with the working of other faculty member in centre’s program. Her view on gender policing and male perspective may diminish the professional identify of Sarah and centre program as whole.
Ethical standards: Ethically, the case provides the descriptive information on the behaviour the person should perform in an organisation without biasness. For instance, Sarah has developed a reputation in the centre program. She ensured the qualitative and quantitative display of racial, cultural, lingual, and ethical values in the organisation.
Profession practice: Professional practice helps one to attain profession identity. Sarah has developed a good professional status in the organizationbecause of her hard work, leadership, and good work. She balanced her relation with children, parents, and female colleagues. Moreover, professionally she always conveys a depth of knowledge with her team workers to achieve the objective of centre’s program.
The difference in thinking and actions in an organisation may turn a pleasant working environment into toxic. Similar is the case with Sarah and the writer. Both have different perception and views on addressing children benefit. Sarah’s disgusting view on male counterpart affects the working potential of writer. Moreover, the higher rate of interference f Sarah in other is working alsoeffect the work potential of the colleagues. The problem can be mitigating if a thorough discussion between writer and Sarah was implement. Both must politely discuss the issues, problems, and action. You make them to achieve and come to a common point that will help in building children development as well as development of professional behaviour.
The case comprises the different working behaviour of two personalities Karen and Leslie. Both character work on the same platform, on the same organization but have distinct beliefs, culture, identity, and professionalism toward wok, colleagues, and students. The case describes how teacher behaviour affects the student and their mental growth.
The writer believes that the activities, the curriculum must comply with the student interest. According to ECA, the curriculum provided in an organization must enrich children’s learning, balancing children's work, and provide them an environment suitable for earning. Moreover, ECA guidelines suggest that the educator must ensure that children are not discriminated in the basis of age, ability, race, economic status, ethnicity, religion, language, culture, sexuality, lifestyle, and family background. However, Karen has an opposite view on child education. Karen makes the fun of his class student Jose in front of another student. Karen regularly insults Jose in front of the other children as Jose is Spanish and not speaks broken English. The author follows children-centric approach towards their development, future and learning. She also tried to develop the suitable environment for every student so as children may not feel awkward or alone.
The case writer develops a sense of tension in his/her mind that he/she cannot work in a place where children are treated in a poorly manner. The writer believes that in any organization, children should be treated properly so that, it may not hinder their thought process about education, should not develop a misrepresentation of the education system, teachers, and counsellors. If this way of teaching continues where the student is exposed, then it may lead to a mental disturbance among children. Moreover, the writer beliefs that the children must not be treaded and must not be based on the basis of their culture, ethnicity, lifestyle, mother tongue, and family background.
The tension due to education affects children and families worse. According to the Australian professional standard, teachers, or any educator is responsible for preparing, developing a young mind to lead a successful and productive life (Early childhood Australia). In the workplace, children are treated so poorly in a way that they don’t want to come to school and not want to participate in any program.
Case Writer: The case author highly exceeds the professional expectation. The author reaches office on time, i.e., is obeying the office timings and code of conduct. The author also knows about the way, procedure, or method to treat the young minds. She/he is very much aware of the fact that no student should be based based on their culture. Although the author has put forward and talked with Karen regarding the misconduct she has done with Jose. The author also actively engages in the implementation of new things for the betterment of the organization. The author thinks that as a coordinator she wants to improve the program for the sake of children's development.
Karen: Karen fell short as per the professionalism expectation. This is because of her misbehaviour towards Jose. As a teacher of younger students, one should not develop the characteristics of making fun, ignorance, and mimicking of young children. Moreover, he discriminates against children based on race, culture, ethnicity, and family background. She always makes fun of Joe because he is from Spain and can talk with broken English. Moreover, Karen does not follow the official timing of the organization as instead of 10:30, she usually joins the office one hour late at 11:30. This is also not professional.
Julie: Julie falls short as per the professional expectation. This is because she does not show any positive behaviour toward the working organization. As when the author joined the organization, Julie’s reaction was not good, she does not show positive body gesture, although talked with author briskly as if the organization is not good to work for anyone. This provides a negative professional expression in an organization. According to ECA, one should follow a good code of conduct and code of ethics in the organisation to fulfil the goals. Moreover, Julie does not follow the incoming timing of the organization as instead of 10:30, she usually joins office at 11:30. This is also not professional.
Ethical: Ethically, the author follows office timing and come reach office on time. This is considered as a positive professional characteristic. However, the other character of the case becomes habitual of late coming to the office that is ethically not good in an organization.
Professional: Professional practice helps one to attain professional identity. The author has tried to develop a good professional status in the organization in terms of children's safety, children's wellbeing, and children's development. Moreover, professionally she always conveys and helps others to treat children irrespective of their culture, and family background.
Working as a coordinator at an Oakleaf Scholl was a good move for the author as it may help the author to lead his/her life and be financially stable. Although, after joining Hershel is not convinced with the work culture, with the behaviour of colleagues towards children, with the resource availability. The author will advise RECE to follow the guidelines, standards of the good practice as an educator. Moreover, it will recommend to RECE that in every situation educator need to consider and react in relation to community, students, family, organization, and colleagues.
The case study describes the development of a feeling of misconception, misbelieve, and misperception with the supervisor of the community centre. The reason for the development of these feeling is the improper working of the RECE in the organisation. The study also determines the lack of proper communication and lack of strict action between the RECE and the supervisor. In the centre, RECE misconduct her duties and actions based on financial strain.
Case writer: the author thinks that there is some sort of decryption happening in the organisation with respect to the fees submission. According to the author, Saba is discriminating the full fee-paying families and fee, assistance family. This creates a sense of feeling within the author that centre's working philosophy has not properly communicated with the staff of the organisation.
Saba: According to Saba, there is some equality among the children with respect to the fee structure. That is why she thinks that MR. and Mrs Zaid pay their child fee on time.
Mr and Mrs Zaid: Mr and Mrs Zaid were very thankful to the organization; the organisation has accepted their wish for delay fee submission although having fee concession. Moreover, they were also happy with the timely admission of their child without the fee submission.
The main impact of the case is Saba behaviour toward children and family, she has developed the characteristics of discriminating children based on the type of fee submitted, that is, fully paid children and fee concession children. This discrimination creates a set of mental torture to the children and family. According to ECA, the teacher or educator must develop a respectful relationship based on open communication with the aim of encouraging, families, encouraging children, and engaging them toward a strong sense of belonging and trustfulness. However, Saba has also breached the centre’s policies of asking Mr. and Mrs, Zaid their class schedule. This was intolerable as no staffs in any organisation have the right to ask the family plans and their work.
According to me, the writer has fallen short for professionalism. Although she has developed a sense of humanity, trust, and are towards M. In addition, Mrs Zaid, she was unable to develop a strong professional relationship with Sada. Sada directly interact with Mr. and Ms. Zaid without notifying her supervisor. Moreover, under Maggie supervision, Sada has tried to discriminate children based on their fee submission. Her actions were not justifiable as she has not done any consultation with Sada and never explained her importance of confidentiality and centre working policies.
Going forward, what are some steps that staff could take to ensure that the centre’s values about being inclusive, sensitive, and building responsive relationships with families is affectively communicated?
To build a good, strong and healthy relationship with the family of children, one should follow good and clean communication strategies. Always acknowledge the family’s interest, their views, and their perspective in term of children upgrade and development. Enhance their trust by providing positive feedback about their children and ensure them about the children’s good and safe future.
Ethical: The discrimination of children based on the fee structure is ethically not correct. Moreover breaching the hierarchical flow is also not ethically good. Sada followed both things. She broke the hierarchal flow and contacted Joe families regarding their time schedule, without informing her supervisor. Moreover, she has also not maintained child right, as she tried to discriminate children based on fee submission and family background.
Professional: The author has equipped with communication skills such honesty, work ethic, flexibility, harmony with parents, eager and willing to help children and her co-workers. These can illustrated from the scene when Maggie has warmed welcome Mr and Mrs Zaid, and provide them with a relief of submitting fees once they did with their county formalities. Moreover, Maggie has also ensured the early joining of their son without any issue. This shoes that Maggie has fair and good professional characteristics.
To identify the list of families who were been treated similar to Mr and Mrs Zaid, one needs to go through the past record of the student. The families who were connecting to ask for their schedules will be those who have submitted the fees through fee concession. RICE must train well so that they can ensure good communication with the family. The communication should be indirect, as it may not hurt the feeling and perspective of family.
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Early Childhood Assignment Help
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....