A society-based entrepreneurism depicts a comparatively current demonstration of entrepreneurism. Currently, the researchers are showing interest in examining the captivating exchange in between different kinds of functioning in the society and the different commercial activities.
The main purpose of this essay is to critically analyze the special attributes of society-based entrepreneurism and also to showcase the importance of social organizations in the economic condition of a particular country. In this report a due amount of consideration would be given towards analyzing the importance of society-based goals in social entrepreneurship over its business objectives. Also, the way in which it attempts to achieve its goals by getting involved in a certain business would be discussed (Baldacchino et al. 2015). Moreover, its ability to invest its profit all over again in the organization or in a certain society-based project would be critically discussed. Furthermore, attributes like open responsibility, including members in the regulation of the organization as well as it being a constant and result-driven process will also be analyzed, weighing both the pros and cons of the situation.
The most initial objective of a society-based entrepreneurism is to conduct a commercial activity with a society-based reason in their minds. Also, it can be known as a selfless type of an entrepreneur. Such a businessman integrates both their business as well as society-based concerns in a manner so that it even enhances the standard of living of those individuals who are linked to the concerned motive. Moreover, a society-based entrepreneurism doesn’t take an initiative to evaluate their effectiveness only by means of computing their gains but they mainly evaluate the extent to which they have enhanced the life of people around them.
There are different points of views with regards to the meaning of society-based entrepreneurism (Carraher et al. 2016). According to the viewpoints of a few, a society-based entrepreneurism is known to be a business that generates revenue and those activities that are directed towards enhancing a specific issue by offering a product or a service to the concerned group of customers. While as per the viewpoints of others, it is known to be a commercial activity that obtains funds from the governing bodies to resolve a particular society-based issue.
As per the earned income theory, a society-oriented businessman generates their income by means of trading those products and services to the consumers, who knows that their procurement will assist in terms of a specified motive. It can range from offering soaps to the poor children with an attempt to safeguard them from the impact of certain kinds of diseases. Furthermore, individuals are frequently driven towards a commercial activity that applies a society-based entrepreneurship framework as it is assisting the course of resolving a specific issue while they are consuming their money on their necessities or desires (Urban et al. 2017). For instance, when an organization named TOM was developed, it made use of its idea of sole product for another sole product, wherein the concerned organization offered a free of cost shoes to the deprived section of the society for every pair of shoes purchased by their customers (Gaddefors et al. 2017).
The very first attribute of a society-based entrepreneurship is its social objective over its commercial objectives. Such business-men make use of their commercial competencies as well as imaginative competencies to assist in determining as well as resolving a society-based problem on a broad scale (Yitshaki et al. 2016). As per the Schwab Foundation of Society-based entrepreneurism, a society-based businessman is known to be an enthusiastic risk bearer who makes use of their innovation as well as realistic ideas to offer advantages to the society via their range of commercial activities. Moreover, the concerned objective has a set of advantages both in terms of its commercial activities as well as its society-based goals.
It offers benefit in the context of executing a society-oriented transformation that is in terms of the most effective influence it creates on the society. A socially-oriented businessman works with the motive of developing a commercial activity in different kinds of sectors that has the potential to generate a favorable influence on the community. This mostly consists of optional energies, health consciousness as well as in the context of learning. As per David Bornstein, who is the writer of “ How to Change the World”, the socially-oriented businessmen assumes the society to be an explanation of certain commodities and services and not as possessors of these commodities and provisions (Kraus, et al. 2017). A society-based businessman offers funds and knowledge that assists the members of a society to enhance their standard of living. Also, it provides benefits in terms of generating an influential explanation that is their independence to analyze as well as generate latest types of explanations that have the potential to influence a particular type of transformation. Moreover, a society-based businessman is always in the quest of an innovative as well as explorative explanation to the various issues faced by the people living in a society. Also, it frequently incorporates the leaderships in their concerned sector to help in the purpose of creating an assignment (Dey et al. 2016). Hence, they are prone to take several risks, being creative and to bring out innovative techniques to resolve a particular issue.
Furthermore, a society- oriented businessmen enjoys the provision of working as their own owners (Littlewood et al. 2018). They are free from any kind of restrictions and they can easily perform as per their own thoughts and beliefs. As per the portal of PBS, in the last 10 years of the 20th century, an acceleration has been determined in entrepreneurism as well as in terms of the challenges in the society-based sector. They are known to be dedicated resolvers of issues, who possess great expertise of a leader and are very much enthusiastic, this can provide them with discontentment in terms of a customary connection between a recruiter and the workforce of an organization (Sengupta et al. 2017).
Lastly, they enjoy the benefit of developing prospects of work as well as revenue generation opportunities and in this way it can prove to be of great value in terms of the economic condition of a country.
In the due course of serving the social goals, the society-based entrepreneurism also has a range of drawbacks, including their difficulties in terms of creating a positive image in the minds of the members of the society (Tiwari et al. 2017). Also, it is really complex, in the current times to demonstrate responsibility as well as growth of the societal business frameworks because of a lesser number of case records. Moreover, a society-based entrepreneurship is prone to very less exposure both virtually as well as non-virtually, hence often the people living in the society get a wrong impression about the same. The main reason for such a kind of distrust, that they are not aware of the business, thereby developing false knowledge about the same. Another big drawback about the same is the absence of assisting platforms as well as finances. But unfortunately, due to the absence of adequate norms as well as identifications in the case of social organizations, the setting is not considered to be perfect (Nandan et al. 2015). Also, it requires the development of new paths and this calls for a greater amount of hard work than normal form of commercial activities. Furthermore, it also suffers from the risk of getting interrupted in the middle because of the absence of shareholders, norms and principles.
A society-based entrepreneurship is determined to have a social goal, that they tend to achieve by means of involving themselves in some kind of a business. Hence, if the concerned organization embraces social accountability by involving them in a business, it would be easier for them to establish a connection with their customers and also keep them involved with the product or service of the organization. Reason being, if a company is attempting to achieve its social goals while engaging themselves in a business, they are even contributing toward explaining the advantages of their commodities as well as provisions to the society as a whole. Moreover, corporate social responsibility is a technique through which the manly face of a particular person is demonstrated. This is the reason due to which a particular commercial activity handles an individual and paves way for them to establish a connection with them through the use of their own language by means of demonstrating some extent of mankind. Also, it is considered to be sensible for the majority of the business to involve themselves in the process of developing the society by only taking the assistance of the social efforts of the organization in relation to their commodities as well as services (Josefy et al. 2017).
Furthermore, it is considered to be the most effective means to make a contribution towards the community as well as the individuals living in the community. By making their contributions in the domestic as well as nation-based non-profitable platforms, a particular commercial activity can assist in the process of supporting the community as a whole. In this way, a particular commercial organization can engage themselves in the process of working towards a community and also assist in its development by making use of society-oriented efforts in the direction of that particular organization by making investments in educational modules for the deprived children as well as those living in the roads. Furthermore, they offer destitute care services for those living on the roads as well as the fugitives (Kimbu et al. 2016). In this way it can assist a non-profit organization in terms of contributing financially in the most efficient donation-based assignments (Caroli et al. 2018). For instance, a restaurant can offer food to the people without any shelter or to a home for the orphans living in the society.
Thus, if a commercial activity is making a favorable endeavour towards the society, then in reality they are even providing advantages to the organization in its due course of the same. Hence, it is considered to be a profound as well as a realistic way to provide returns to the society (Becker et al. 2017). In this context, social entrepreneurship also has a range of disadvantages like that it requires a huge amount of finance for an organization to execute such social initiatives in the course of conducting a commercial activity and this is mostly applicable in the case of small-scale organizations (Haugh et al. 2016). Also, it is considered to be a troublesome procedure for large scale organizations as well. It has been critically determined that social accountability for an organization can be an activity in the direction of its usefulness (Muñoz et al. 2016). In this context, if a particular manager compromises with the gain of the company in terms of the advantages of the society, he will also be a risk of losing hands from his job.
To be able to invest their profits again towards a society-oriented objective is another special attribute of a society-based entrepreneurship. However, it does not imply that such an organization should work towards generating revenue instead they should use their income in the direction of benefiting the society. This attribute of social entrepreneurship can serve to be an advantage because by reinvesting the profits generated by the organization will be in the direction of dealing with different issues prevailing in the society or towards enhancing the society, the living standard of people as well as the atmosphere around them. Also, it does not depend on any types of sponsorships as it depends on the profits of their company to enhance the society (Goyal et al. 2015). However, they accept grants that will enable them to compensate for their expenses. Additionally, social entrepreneurship in the concerned context has a major drawback of suffering from the impact of transformation in the market as well as the latest version not being effective in terms of the society. It is even considered to be a complicated process for a social entrepreneurship venture to generate profit as well as to be beneficial for society together.
To democratically involve people in the regulation of its business is a significant attribute of social entrepreneurship. The advantage here is that it can be influential to perform duties as volunteering (Engelke et al. 2015). Such an initiative mostly drives the interest of those individuals who are really enthusiastic about the concerned society-based motives for which they are working. However, the drawback here is that as the concerned social entrepreneurship broadens, the inspiration they get from new individuals gets out of focus and is not remembered any more.
To be openly responsible is another unique characteristic of social enterpreneurship. The benefit here is that the customers are highly driven towards those companies who have a sound image and that which is socially accountable (Martin et al. 2015). Moreover, the openness as well as the responsible characteristics of social entrepreneurship also drives the interests of the shareholders like that of the mutual finance that takes an initiative to unify the social accountability of an organization into its product selection procedure (Waldron et al. 2016). However, there are certain organizations who portray their products and services to be environmentally-friendly and also label them in that way, when they are actually not doing so. In this context, there are certain consumers who will behave favorably towards such depictions but others might not (Tan et al. 2015). Hence, it will be a drawback in terms of the organization losing the loyalty of their customers.
Finally, social entrepreneurship is considered to be a continuous as well as a result driven initiative, wherein they are always in quest of latest techniques to give importance to their prevailing provisions and also it is not exposed to immediate means of fiscal gains (Ramoglou et al. 2015). The advantage here is that it is ready to overcome the most fierce problems that the society is going to provide. The drawback here is that there is a chance that a social entrepreneurship is most likely to experience a downfall at its most primary level. But in order to be a well-accomplished society-based entrepreneur it is significant to survive after the primary downfalls and also work towards providing an impactful explanation for the same (Stephan et al. 2015). Furthermore, it has been determined that a proficient society-based entrepreneur is actually aware of the technique to grasp an understanding from their downfall and on the basis of that they should be able to modify their existing techniques and work towards constant planned enhancements.
Social organizations have the potential to concentrate in a much improved manner towards generating an economy-based proposition by means of reducing the price of its products or services and also by optimizing its effectiveness. Also, the organizations can get the importance of the society in line with the key skills of such organizations (Sekliuckiene et al. 2015). This paves way for enhancing the level of encouragement, faithfulness, advancement of competencies as well as in terms of differentiating their commodities. Moreover, in the context of social entrepreneurship the connection among the collaborated is integrated. Hence, if they focus on the values of the society as well as on its economical importance, it will be successful in terms of improving their image in the direction of the customers, regulating the body and the society as a whole.
Social organizations have the capacity to drive a transformation in the economical condition of a particular country (Chell et al. 2016). Moreover, social organizations do not only offer any explanation in the context of downturns of job as well as in terms of the deprived section of the society. In this context only, a social business generates a prospect for the community as a whole. Moreover, it has been determined that a society-based entrepreneurism can only continue to exist if the commercial activity conducted by that particular organization is generating sufficient income for the concerned organization (Rivera et al. 2015). Also, it is known to be a constant initiative that can prove to be effective, if the concerned commercial activity has a unique commercial objective providing assisting to a society-based motive.
In case of a country, where there are a number of problems in terms of deprivation, lack of job opportunities, absence of proper health as well as cleanliness related provisions, social enterprises are considered to be the most effective way to move ahead in that particular direction. The problem with this perspective lies in the fact that there is no adequate format available for the purpose of motivating the youths to embrace this particular perspective. Also, there is a lack of awareness programs in this type of country in terms of educating the youths for an optional choice in the context of making their career (Rawhouser et al. 2019). Moreover, there is even a misconception that social organizations extract money from the deprived section of the society, which has been determined to be a complete lie. However, it is often determined to be a complex procedure to obtain finance for supporting a social cause from the viewpoint of an organization attempting to generate revenue for their business (Phillips et al. 2015).
Furthermore, the effectiveness of society-based entrepreneurship is determined by measuring the amount of life a particular initiative has changed. Finally, in the context of a society-based entrepreneurship it is significant to be alert and have a strategy aimed at its main cause with an attempt to enhance the standard of living of a particular country and even resolve the problems with regards to the nation. It’s objective of treating the services it offers to a particular country as a complete opportunity and not as a secondary service, is also assisting in the process of constantly creating fruitful explanations to handle a particular society-based problem.
Through this essay it can be concluded that a society-based entrepreneurship has an objective of generating profit from their commercial activities and utilizing the same in various different needs and requirements prevailing in the society. It has been determined that such an entrepreneurship utilizes their income to enhance the standard of living of the people living in the society. It has been determined that it is very much significant for a social enterprise to have a sound reputation, so that they can easily drive the interest of the customers as well as the shareholders who would be considered providing support to such organizations. Furthermore, there is a lack of awareness among the young generation of people to consider social entrepreneurship as one of the options to consider as their career. However, it has been determined that social entrepreneurship is the most effective means of eliminating poverty from the society and enhancing the living standard of those living in the society.
Baldacchino, L., Ucbasaran, D., Cabantous, L. and Lockett, A., 2015. Entrepreneurship research on intuition: A critical analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), pp.212-231. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijmr.12056
Becker, S., Kunze, C. and Vancea, M., 2017. Community energy and social entrepreneurship: Addressing purpose, organisation and embeddedness of renewable energy projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, pp.25-36. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652617300550
Carraher, S.M., Welsh, D.H. and Svilokos, A., 2016. Validation of a measure of social entrepreneurship. European Journal of International Management, 10(4), pp.386-402. Retrieved from https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/EJIM.2016.077421
Caroli, M.G., Fracassi, E., Maiolini, R. and Carnini Pulino, S., 2018. Exploring social innovation components and attributes: a taxonomy proposal. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(2), pp.94-109. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19420676.2018.1448296
Chell, E., Spence, L.J., Perrini, F. and Harris, J.D., 2016. Social entrepreneurship and business ethics: Does social equal ethical?. Journal of business ethics, 133(4), pp.619-625. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-014-2439-6.pdf
Dey, P. and Steyaert, C., 2016. Rethinking the space of ethics in social entrepreneurship: Power, subjectivity, and practices of freedom. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), pp.627-641. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-014-2450-y.pdf
Engelke, H., Mauksch, S., Darkow, I.L. and Heiko, A., 2015. Opportunities for social enterprise in Germany—Evidence from an expert survey. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, pp.635-646. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016251400016X
Gaddefors, J. and Anderson, A.R., 2017. Entrepreneursheep and context: when entrepreneurship is greater than entrepreneurs. International journal of entrepreneurial behavior & research. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2016-0040/full/html
Goyal, S. and Sergi, B.S., 2015. SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY--UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 4(3). Retrieved from https://www.jssidoi.org/jssi/uploads/journals/Journal_of_Security_and_Sustainability_Issues_Vol4_No3_print.pdf#page=79
Haugh, H.M. and Talwar, A., 2016. Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), pp.643-658. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-014-2449-4.pdf
Josefy, M., Dean, T.J., Albert, L.S. and Fitza, M.A., 2017. The role of community in crowdfunding success: Evidence on cultural attributes in funding campaigns to “save the local theater”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), pp.161-182. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/etap.12263
Kimbu, A.N. and Ngoasong, M.Z., 2016. Women as vectors of social entrepreneurship. Annals of Tourism Research, 60, pp.63-79. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160738316300846
Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Halberstadt, J., Shaw, E. and Syrjä, P., 2017. Social entrepreneurship orientation: development of a measurement scale. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0206/full/html
Littlewood, D. and Holt, D., 2018. Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Exploring the influence of environment. Business & Society, 57(3), pp.525-561. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0007650315613293
Martin, R.L. and Osberg, S., 2015. Getting beyond better: How social entrepreneurship works. Harvard Business Review Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8FlkCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=social+entrepreneurship+critical+analysis&ots=Q1iWrNeBJn&sig=DhlAkVtpAul20WB6jmKzKOwwBZQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Muñoz, P. and Kibler, E., 2016. Institutional complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), pp.1314-1318. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296315005214
Nandan, M., London, M. and Bent-Goodley, T., 2015. Social workers as social change agents: Social innovation, social intrapreneurship, and social entrepreneurship. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), pp.38-56. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23303131.2014.955236
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N. and James, P., 2015. Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), pp.428-461. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1059601114560063
Ramoglou, S. and Zyglidopoulos, S.C., 2015. The constructivist view of entrepreneurial opportunities: a critical analysis. Small Business Economics, 44(1), pp.71-78. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11187-014-9590-4.pdf
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M. and Newbert, S.L., 2019. Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), pp.82-115. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1042258717727718
Rivera-Santos, M., Holt, D., Littlewood, D. and Kolk, A., 2015. Social entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), pp.72-91. Retrieved from https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amp.2013.0128?journalCode=amp
Saebi, T., Foss, N.J. and Linder, S., 2019. Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), pp.70-95. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0149206318793196
Sekliuckiene, J. and Kisielius, E., 2015. Development of social entrepreneurship initiatives: a theoretical framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp.1015-1019. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815058747
Sengupta, S. and Sahay, A., 2017. Social entrepreneurship research in Asia-Pacific: Perspectives and opportunities. Social Enterprise Journal. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEJ-11-2016-0050/full/html
Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L.M. and Stride, C., 2015. Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), pp.308-331. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/jibs.2014.38
Tan, W.L. and Yoo, S.J., 2015. Social entrepreneurship intentions of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(1), pp.103-125. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19420676.2014.954260
Tiwari, P., Bhat, A.K. and Tikoria, J., 2017. An empirical analysis of the factors affecting social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7(1), p.9. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40497-017-0067-1
Urban, B. and Kujinga, L., 2017. The institutional environment and social entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0218/full/html
Waldron, T.L., Fisher, G. and Pfarrer, M., 2016. How social entrepreneurs facilitate the adoption of new industry practices. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), pp.821-845. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joms.12187
Yitshaki, R. and Kropp, F., 2016. Motivations and opportunity recognition of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), pp.546-565. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jsbm.12157
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Entrepreneurship Assignment Help
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....