The principle of common good refers to much of what precisely has a position for everyone by ethics in their natural morality. A culture involving persons whose own welfare is inextricably connected to the good of the world is believed by this approach to ethics of common good. Community individuals are bound by the promotion of mutual ideals and priorities in our society. The basic concept of the common good is the total sum of social regulations that allow individuals to achieve their fulfillment more completely and easily, either as communities or as individuals (Bishop, 2010). The common good means that each person, irrespective of how big or small, has an opportunity to continue in promoting public assistance perhaps as an opportunity to benefit from that government help. Regular means 'comprehensive': no area of the population can be rejected or absolved by the advantage of all. On the off possibility that any part of the population, even at an insignificant stage, is prevented from an interest in the existence of the network, at that point that is a logical contradiction with the principle of the gain of all and calls for reform (Wales, 1996). One of the ideals of Catholic social philosophy is the greater good. The problem selected from the unit outline is the inadequate availability during the COVID 19 pandemic of medical equipment and personal protective equipment.
The pandemic is unequal because health access is directly dependent on one's social and economic status. Primarily, wages, schooling, welfare, marginalization, and segregation decide who will suffer the most. Our public health scheme aims to mitigate the influence of these social and economic factors by patching up a temporary vessel's violations. A democratic "patchwork" is our democratic "health." Present pandemic and disease monitoring networks are failing us worldwide. To accurately map the racial inequities, we need a visualization to track the infection with detailed indicators divided by culture and racial history. It is seen with certainty, nevertheless, that the social gap would remain for COVID-19 (Avery et al., 2020). It took many rounds, more than two to five years, to gain herd immunity to the disease, with all the major influenza pandemics. Therefore, to save and recycle protective clothing and equipment where possible, we need safe, low-cost, integrated manufacturing and manufacturing techniques, and community-based service networks to minimize the effects on mental health. With its accelerated dissemination worldwide and resulting mortality burden, the Covid-19 pandemic marks an unprecedented global tragedy unseen in the past century, leading to deep economic repercussions. In such an extraordinary situation, several organizations were not able to cope with the ensuing large-scale disruptions. The problems faced by companies in the manufacture of critical medical devices industry are among the most urgent (Barry, 2020). COVID 19 is a global catastrophe that affects nearly every single area of the globe, the condition it has generated in society seems to be quite difficult. Only one potential solution that was seen was to limit the virus's spread. There is, however, a critical need for adequate equipment and treatment in the world for mitigation. In developing or underdeveloped nations, which lack adequate programs and policies, the situation is worsening even more, and the pandemic is growing at an unprecedented pace. There is no sufficient availability of PPE and products, which is a concern that has contributed to the exposure of our health staff. It is very necessary to provide the frontline staff with adequate PPE for their service at this time because they play an important role in this era (Rebmann, Vassallo & Holdsworth, 2020). There is no greater good in comparison to the ideals of the Common Good, as though someone is robbed of anything he wants. One of the harshest lessons of the pandemic so far has been the insecurity of health workers (Ait, 2020). Though not representative, statistics from several countries in all WHO areas suggest that health workers' COVID-19 infections are much higher than those in the general population. A major psychological toll has also been taken by the tension of the pandemic, compounded by a stressful job atmosphere and concerns for personal and family welfare. One in four frontline health workers reported signs of stress and anxiety after the COVID-19 epidemic, a new study of health care practitioners showed. What is more, in their everyday lives, health workers face increasing levels of sexism, verbal abuse, and physical aggression (Giusti et al., 2020). The WHO calls on national governments and related resources to ensure the protection of health care workers and to contribute to practical steps that ensure healthcare professionals and patients with healthy environments, such as implementing effective legislation, labor laws and ensuring adequate Ultimately, only if health staff are healthy will patients be healthy. The WHO has presented concrete World Patient Care Day 2020-2021 goals for healthcare facilities in the next year to invest in, monitor, and improve the safety of health staff. Among other main safety issues, the priorities discuss personal security procedures, occupational injury tension, and burnout (Houghton et al., 2020). COVID-19 has exposed significant weaknesses in the processes designed to shield both health staff and patients from damage. They would do more now that governments and local care officials know more.
The Covid-19 pandemic is a fast-changing situation, and due to restrictive policies, access to populations will easily become restricted. Start scheduling now, as there could be little time to formulate new strategies for the involvement of the community. This involves how to engage with diverse groups; contact information for interested stakeholders; and identifying with audiences the key perceptions, risks, and threats, and deciding their responses. The protection of health workers and patient safety are indistinguishable, and the potential of the planet to combat the coronavirus pandemic effectively relies on our ability to protect health workers. That is why an often ignored element of patient care, the protection of healthcare professionals, is critical for the public health community. Community officials, traditional healers, religious figures, classes of women, and Youth organizations are in a powerful role, willing to connect various individuals within and outside their culture and provide a focal point when the remote control is needed to access others (Howard-Grabman et al., 2017). Many countries have placed limits on travel to monitor the spread of Covid-19, and have called for self-isolation (i.e. remaining at home) for those who are more vulnerable to infection. If this affects the populations you partner in, explore how they can do this comfortably and with affected groups, especially those at greater risk, and with women and girls who could carry more of the burden of treatment. To formulate action plans and collaborate with numerous organizations to execute using the tools available. The organizations must protect and secure our health staff, who lose their own lives in the line of service, as worldwide coronavirus cases hit new highs (Fagherazzi et al., 2020). In addition to concerns relating to the feasibility and protection of these solutions, an important collection of ethical, legal, social, economic, and environmental concerns is also posed by the pace at which they have been created and made accessible to the public.
Ait, L. T. (2020). Accessibility of goods and services during covid-19. Retrieved from https://odr.chalmers.se/bitstream/20.500.12380/301030/1/Linda-Triin%20Ait.pdf
Avery, C., Bossert, W., Clark, A., Ellison, G., & Ellison, S. F. (2020). Policy implications of models of the spread of coronavirus: Perspectives and opportunities for economists (No. w27007). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Barry, J. M. (2020). The great influenza: The story of the deadliest pandemic in history. Penguin UK.
Bishop. (2010). Choosing the common good. Graphic House, 124 City Road, Stoke on Trent ST4 2PH: Alive Publishing Ltd.
Fagherazzi, G., Goetzinger, C., Rashid, M. A., Aguayo, G. A., & Huiart, L. (2020). Digital health strategies to fight COVID-19 worldwide: challenges, recommendations, and a call for papers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e19284.
Giusti, E. M., Pedroli, E., D'Aniello, G. E., Badiale, C. S., Pietrabissa, G., Manna, C., ... & Molinari, E. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on health professionals: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
Houghton, C., Meskell, P., Delaney, H., Smalle, M., Glenton, C., Booth, A., ... & Biesty, L. M. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: A rapid qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4).
Howard-Grabman, L., Miltenburg, A. S., Marston, C., & Portela, A. (2017). Factors affecting effective community participation in maternal and newborn health programme planning, implementation and quality of care interventions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 268.
Rebmann, T., Vassallo, A., & Holdsworth, J. E. (2020). Availability of personal protective equipment and infection prevention supplies during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic: A national study by the APIC COVID-19 task force. American Journal of Infection Control, 1-10.
Wales, B. o. (1996). The Common Good and the Catholic Church’s Social Teaching.Reterived from http://www.catholicsocialteaching.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/THE-COMMON-GOOD-AND-THE-CATHOLIC-CHURCH_1996.pdf
Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Nursing Assignment Help
Proofreading and Editing$9.00Per Page
Consultation with Expert$35.00Per Hour
Live Session 1-on-1$40.00Per 30 min.
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
My Assignment Services acknowledges the academic integrity guidelines prescribed as per Australian Universities to ensure that the services, sample material, and study resources available on our website, in no way are utilised to commit academic misconduct of any type. All users of our services must adhere to and affirm acceptance of all conditions elucidated in our policy document on academic integrity.